Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Tome of Battle: Bo9S classes in actual play?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nifft" data-source="post: 3254516" data-attributes="member: 6562"><p>It's my opinion that the Fighter is the weakest of the Core classes, starting around level 5 (perhaps level 3). IF you allow feats from PHB-II and Complete Warrior, they may get a bit better -- I haven't looked at PHB-II very hard.</p><p></p><p>IMHO, the Bard makes the Fighter look pathetically weak, starting around level 7. And that's sad.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Weapon Specialization is VERY weak for a Warblade -- even weaker than it would be for a normal greatsword Barbarian. Why is it so weak?</p><p></p><p>1/ Weapon Spec sucks for melee combat. Power Attack + Weapon Focus do the same job much better (and you can use them at 1st level). (For an archer, Weapon Spec is great. For a TWF tumbler whose MO is to get a lot of full attacks with light weapons, it can be okay.)</p><p></p><p>2/ Weapon Spec sucks even more for a Warblade, who will most often NOT take a full attack -- he will prefer to use his Maneuvers, which tend to be single attacks. (The very notable exception to this is Time Stands Still, which actually makes Weapon Spec shine almost as brightly as it does for an archer.)</p><p></p><p>3/ Changing Stance, or using a Boost or Counter, will eat your Swift action. So, the Warblade's recovery mechanism is actually not that great -- particularly if your opponents know this fact. Basically, if you use your Will save counter, you can't do so again for 2 rounds.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>We agree about Barbarian > Fighter for sure! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>The thing about a Barbarian is, his Rage is a <u>free</u> action. He has all these unused Swift actions lying around. If you can find some tactical feats to give you Swift things to do -- particularly ones that allow you to use your Intimidate -- I think you'll find that the Barbarian is all caught up to the Warblade. (Now, I only <u>think</u> this -- I can't actually back it up -- but that's what I've heard about the new stuff in the PHB-II.)</p><p></p><p>I'll do some reading in the PHB-II and the Tactical feats in Comp.War and get back to you on this, if that's okay. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The Warblade can pull off about two rounds worth of maneuvers, then he needs to recharge. And in the round that he does his recharge, he's a Fighter with fewer feats and no heavy armor proficiency. (I figure he's got one Counter, one Boost, and two Strikes; or two Counters, two Strikes.)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Absolutely. Both are very melee-centric, and that's why they look so strong: being limited to melee is a weakness.</p><p></p><p>The Barbarian gets a speed boost though, so he can close the distance faster; also, Barbarians are proficient with composite longbows. (Is there a bow special ability that adjusts its "Mighty" bonus when your strength changes? If so, Barbarians may become excellent archers... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> )</p><p></p><p></p><p>Cheers, -- N</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nifft, post: 3254516, member: 6562"] It's my opinion that the Fighter is the weakest of the Core classes, starting around level 5 (perhaps level 3). IF you allow feats from PHB-II and Complete Warrior, they may get a bit better -- I haven't looked at PHB-II very hard. IMHO, the Bard makes the Fighter look pathetically weak, starting around level 7. And that's sad. Weapon Specialization is VERY weak for a Warblade -- even weaker than it would be for a normal greatsword Barbarian. Why is it so weak? 1/ Weapon Spec sucks for melee combat. Power Attack + Weapon Focus do the same job much better (and you can use them at 1st level). (For an archer, Weapon Spec is great. For a TWF tumbler whose MO is to get a lot of full attacks with light weapons, it can be okay.) 2/ Weapon Spec sucks even more for a Warblade, who will most often NOT take a full attack -- he will prefer to use his Maneuvers, which tend to be single attacks. (The very notable exception to this is Time Stands Still, which actually makes Weapon Spec shine almost as brightly as it does for an archer.) 3/ Changing Stance, or using a Boost or Counter, will eat your Swift action. So, the Warblade's recovery mechanism is actually not that great -- particularly if your opponents know this fact. Basically, if you use your Will save counter, you can't do so again for 2 rounds. We agree about Barbarian > Fighter for sure! :) The thing about a Barbarian is, his Rage is a [u]free[/u] action. He has all these unused Swift actions lying around. If you can find some tactical feats to give you Swift things to do -- particularly ones that allow you to use your Intimidate -- I think you'll find that the Barbarian is all caught up to the Warblade. (Now, I only [u]think[/u] this -- I can't actually back it up -- but that's what I've heard about the new stuff in the PHB-II.) I'll do some reading in the PHB-II and the Tactical feats in Comp.War and get back to you on this, if that's okay. :) The Warblade can pull off about two rounds worth of maneuvers, then he needs to recharge. And in the round that he does his recharge, he's a Fighter with fewer feats and no heavy armor proficiency. (I figure he's got one Counter, one Boost, and two Strikes; or two Counters, two Strikes.) Absolutely. Both are very melee-centric, and that's why they look so strong: being limited to melee is a weakness. The Barbarian gets a speed boost though, so he can close the distance faster; also, Barbarians are proficient with composite longbows. (Is there a bow special ability that adjusts its "Mighty" bonus when your strength changes? If so, Barbarians may become excellent archers... :) ) Cheers, -- N [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Tome of Battle: Bo9S classes in actual play?
Top