Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Janx" data-source="post: 5721185" data-attributes="member: 8835">It's great that most folks are cautious before passing judgement.&nbsp; I have a pretty decisive filter.&nbsp; So to me, hearing there's 5 TPKs with this GM makes me think there's a problem.players who like TPKs or games that encourage them are edge cases (there are more sessions of TPK avoiding players than TPK-as-goal game designs being played).Whether it's the GM or the player's fault?&nbsp; I'm inclined to think it's the GM's fault by that point,&nbsp; Something doesn't jive with players being that stupid.&nbsp; I can't imagine a GM putting up with such dumb players to make it to 3 TPKs.&nbsp; Though I supposed it's equally odd that good players would put up with a crappy DM for 5 TPKs.In the original story, it appears the fault is 2 stupid players causing the TPKs.&nbsp; I suppose that seems plausible.&nbsp; They could seem like decent folks, but somehow they drag the party down.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Janx, post: 5721185, member: 8835"] It's great that most folks are cautious before passing judgement. I have a pretty decisive filter. So to me, hearing there's 5 TPKs with this GM makes me think there's a problem. players who like TPKs or games that encourage them are edge cases (there are more sessions of TPK avoiding players than TPK-as-goal game designs being played). Whether it's the GM or the player's fault? I'm inclined to think it's the GM's fault by that point, Something doesn't jive with players being that stupid. I can't imagine a GM putting up with such dumb players to make it to 3 TPKs. Though I supposed it's equally odd that good players would put up with a crappy DM for 5 TPKs. In the original story, it appears the fault is 2 stupid players causing the TPKs. I suppose that seems plausible. They could seem like decent folks, but somehow they drag the party down. [/QUOTE]

Verification