Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Took Enemy Fire in Edition Wars
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lwaxy" data-source="post: 5965945" data-attributes="member: 53286"><p>No, it's not untrue. A good part of the 4e haters (not the critiques) don't have much of a motivation but "down with 4e." I've just experienced a chat session where half the time was spent rejoicing about the death of the hated edition, together with the hopes that nothing of it would go into 5e, all the time not even knowing what 4e was really about, other than "miniatures" and "not an RPG." There were sentiments of "we won" and "now wizards won't try it again" among other even more strange comments. And the atmosphere in the FLGS' around here is largely similar, complete with store owners commenting on how 4e players usually don't want to play in the store. Someone would inevitably come in and make snide comments. </p><p></p><p>There is a big difference between people who don't play 4e </p><p></p><p>- because the rules aren't what they want for D&D and who vocalize their concerns in a useful, polite manner, and who generally don't care if people play 4e and enjoy it.</p><p></p><p>- who jump at you for mentioning you play or, as it has happened to me, for mentioning you took some of the 4e ideas into your houserules. Or make people leave their non-4e groups because of the constant jibes. </p><p></p><p>So no, it's not "just bull." I've seen and heard it, and the community's tendencies to swipe it under the rug is irritating. And those who come at you at games or conventions with anti-4e comments are usually those who don't care what exactly the rules are.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lwaxy, post: 5965945, member: 53286"] No, it's not untrue. A good part of the 4e haters (not the critiques) don't have much of a motivation but "down with 4e." I've just experienced a chat session where half the time was spent rejoicing about the death of the hated edition, together with the hopes that nothing of it would go into 5e, all the time not even knowing what 4e was really about, other than "miniatures" and "not an RPG." There were sentiments of "we won" and "now wizards won't try it again" among other even more strange comments. And the atmosphere in the FLGS' around here is largely similar, complete with store owners commenting on how 4e players usually don't want to play in the store. Someone would inevitably come in and make snide comments. There is a big difference between people who don't play 4e - because the rules aren't what they want for D&D and who vocalize their concerns in a useful, polite manner, and who generally don't care if people play 4e and enjoy it. - who jump at you for mentioning you play or, as it has happened to me, for mentioning you took some of the 4e ideas into your houserules. Or make people leave their non-4e groups because of the constant jibes. So no, it's not "just bull." I've seen and heard it, and the community's tendencies to swipe it under the rug is irritating. And those who come at you at games or conventions with anti-4e comments are usually those who don't care what exactly the rules are. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Took Enemy Fire in Edition Wars
Top