Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Top 25 Sci-Fi movies/tv (1982-present)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HeavenShallBurn" data-source="post: 3991155" data-attributes="member: 39593"><p>Umbran hit it on the head. </p><p></p><p>Sci-Fi requires that the core of the story be driven by the implications of the technology involved. Iron Giant for all its whimsy is archetypal sci-fi, it's a story of how changes induced by a poorly understood or controlled technology cause people to react to it. The story is the technology and the reaction to it. In Quantum leap the "technology" is simply a placeholder plot-device to drive an episodic comedy-drama. Star-Wars, Star Trek, are like WH40K in that they are science fantasy. Star Wars is about the dynastic struggles of groups of wizards with magical swords that just happen to also fly around in space via underdeveloped plot-device tech. Star Trek is a classic exploration/sea voyage tale using space travel with "technology" as plot device but not a central part of the setting or story. Heroes is not sci-fi at all, its fantasy of the superhero subgenre. Children of Men is not a sci-fi, it's a horror-drama. Back to the Future after consideration I'll admit deserves the title sci-fi, whether is deserves a place on the list is debatable but it's sci-fi even if my first inclination is not to grant it that due to the deus ex nature of the technological plot device. Throwing Lost and X-Files in together, they aren't really sci-fi. X-Files dealt very little with technology and its implications, and as much with the supernatural and occult as with its signature alien conspiracy that everyone remembers. Lost is not even marginally sci-fi, it's a drama and the events of the plot do not revolve around technology or questiones derived from it at all. In fact the events would be far more easily interpreted as magical in nature than being derived from any sort of technology. E.T despite the alien is not sci-fi, what exactly to classify it as is difficult but I'd put it under drama. Brazil isn't sci-fi, like 1984 or Brave New World it's nature is political commentary the technology is merely an enabler for the social structure whose existence is the central element of the story.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HeavenShallBurn, post: 3991155, member: 39593"] Umbran hit it on the head. Sci-Fi requires that the core of the story be driven by the implications of the technology involved. Iron Giant for all its whimsy is archetypal sci-fi, it's a story of how changes induced by a poorly understood or controlled technology cause people to react to it. The story is the technology and the reaction to it. In Quantum leap the "technology" is simply a placeholder plot-device to drive an episodic comedy-drama. Star-Wars, Star Trek, are like WH40K in that they are science fantasy. Star Wars is about the dynastic struggles of groups of wizards with magical swords that just happen to also fly around in space via underdeveloped plot-device tech. Star Trek is a classic exploration/sea voyage tale using space travel with "technology" as plot device but not a central part of the setting or story. Heroes is not sci-fi at all, its fantasy of the superhero subgenre. Children of Men is not a sci-fi, it's a horror-drama. Back to the Future after consideration I'll admit deserves the title sci-fi, whether is deserves a place on the list is debatable but it's sci-fi even if my first inclination is not to grant it that due to the deus ex nature of the technological plot device. Throwing Lost and X-Files in together, they aren't really sci-fi. X-Files dealt very little with technology and its implications, and as much with the supernatural and occult as with its signature alien conspiracy that everyone remembers. Lost is not even marginally sci-fi, it's a drama and the events of the plot do not revolve around technology or questiones derived from it at all. In fact the events would be far more easily interpreted as magical in nature than being derived from any sort of technology. E.T despite the alien is not sci-fi, what exactly to classify it as is difficult but I'd put it under drama. Brazil isn't sci-fi, like 1984 or Brave New World it's nature is political commentary the technology is merely an enabler for the social structure whose existence is the central element of the story. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Top 25 Sci-Fi movies/tv (1982-present)
Top