Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="MoonSong" data-source="post: 7790022" data-attributes="member: 6689464">Let's seePartially a good thing, but that same system somehow makes quite hard to pick weapons and armor beyond one's class. Also some of the uses feel counterintuitive and need feats to allow what was basic functionality. So, no.Which IMO all but killed what made the paladin a paladin. And it is incomplete.... PassPart of it is a good thing, but it puts too much of a burden in casters -and who wants to quicken spells only once per day?-&nbsp; Besides it feels antiquated compared to 5e just &quot;use your movement as you need it&quot;Ok, lets begrudgingly agree...Which hardcode combat styles to classes, making it hard to pick. I don't know, but I miss taking TWF with a paladin or a halberd with a sorceress...PassYeah, Goblins are cute. AgreeSo. In short, yes I agree with only two</blockquote>

[QUOTE="MoonSong, post: 7790022, member: 6689464"] Let's see Partially a good thing, but that same system somehow makes quite hard to pick weapons and armor beyond one's class. Also some of the uses feel counterintuitive and need feats to allow what was basic functionality. So, no. Which IMO all but killed what made the paladin a paladin. And it is incomplete.... Pass Part of it is a good thing, but it puts too much of a burden in casters -and who wants to quicken spells only once per day?- Besides it feels antiquated compared to 5e just "use your movement as you need it" Ok, lets begrudgingly agree... Which hardcode combat styles to classes, making it hard to pick. I don't know, but I miss taking TWF with a paladin or a halberd with a sorceress... Pass Yeah, Goblins are cute. Agree So. In short, yes I agree with only two [/QUOTE]

Verification