Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="dracomilan" data-source="post: 6098816" data-attributes="member: 6704093">my point exactly.Hasbro paid for those rights so you pay Hasbro to use them or you spin a different story to sell your own project. This is what I was trying to explain: the moral right is not of these people, even if they worked on the project 15 years ago. I worked for a lot of projects in my life, but since I was an employee, I do not own them.If this wasn't 'goodwill building time' for D&D next, they would have reacted just like GW reacted to the usage of Space Marines ’dress colorurs’ (they apologized but showed a hell lot of muscles and screamed 'do not mess with me'). Is it right? Is it wrong? Well, My (misinformed and I don't know how else I was called by the project advocates) Opinion is that it is right, since D&D is becoming irrilevent just because it being stripped of its defining features from a lot of differrent angles (Pathfinder first, then this) and the end result is:Execution matters, and it is generally accepted that WotC wasn't that good with D&D lately. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>