Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="irdeggman" data-source="post: 3881304" data-attributes="member: 16285">Actually nothing says that the goblin can't see you because of the GCA (the wall however is a different matter).Total concealment does not mean invisible, especially in this case.The description of the power is that it is:And CA:Which is why the &quot;displacement&quot; comparision is pretty accurate, IMO.You need to be careful here - if you say that he can't be seen or that he doesn't need to make a Hide check (because of this) then per the Rules Compendium - he is treated as invisible to his opponent.&nbsp; Now if you give him a bonus to his Hide check (and he succeeds) then he is treated as invisible.&nbsp; But it is very clear that you know what square a character under the effect of GCA is in - since it distorts his appearance and it is only on him and not the square or any other extended area.But the comparison of the tower shield and the &quot;amorphia field&quot; seems pretty good too.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="irdeggman, post: 3881304, member: 16285"] Actually nothing says that the goblin can't see you because of the GCA (the wall however is a different matter). Total concealment does not mean invisible, especially in this case. The description of the power is that it is: And CA: Which is why the "displacement" comparision is pretty accurate, IMO. You need to be careful here - if you say that he can't be seen or that he doesn't need to make a Hide check (because of this) then per the Rules Compendium - he is treated as invisible to his opponent. Now if you give him a bonus to his Hide check (and he succeeds) then he is treated as invisible. But it is very clear that you know what square a character under the effect of GCA is in - since it distorts his appearance and it is only on him and not the square or any other extended area. But the comparison of the tower shield and the "amorphia field" seems pretty good too. [/QUOTE]

Verification