Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- individual adventure modules! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed to plug in to your game.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Touch attack specifics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TYPO5478" data-source="post: 3058777" data-attributes="member: 37531"><p>So the reason is not that it actually makes any sense to do it that way, but that it might be overpowered if we don't?</p><p></p><p>I'm not talking about <em>all</em> attack rolls, just touch attacks. They don't happen that often, especially in melee. Touch spells, trip and grapple attacks. Mages need every advantage they can get (what with crappy BAB and stereotypically low Strength scores), and most characters attempting trips and grapples are probably going to have a higher Strength than Dex anyhow.</p><p></p><p>Why should an incorporeal creature get a bonus to touch attacks from Dex, but a sorceror with an 8 in Strength receive a penalty to the same types of attacks? That's supposed to be balancing? Incorporeal creatures already have that going for them; but if Dex is as big a boon as you say it is, they're getting even further ahead by lacking a Strength score. How does that work out?</p><p></p><p>A nonability in Strength means that a creature "can't exert force." Why then should being able to exert force have any bearing on accurately touching someone? Why would being strong make a character better at making contact with something than being nimble?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TYPO5478, post: 3058777, member: 37531"] So the reason is not that it actually makes any sense to do it that way, but that it might be overpowered if we don't? I'm not talking about [I]all[/I] attack rolls, just touch attacks. They don't happen that often, especially in melee. Touch spells, trip and grapple attacks. Mages need every advantage they can get (what with crappy BAB and stereotypically low Strength scores), and most characters attempting trips and grapples are probably going to have a higher Strength than Dex anyhow. Why should an incorporeal creature get a bonus to touch attacks from Dex, but a sorceror with an 8 in Strength receive a penalty to the same types of attacks? That's supposed to be balancing? Incorporeal creatures already have that going for them; but if Dex is as big a boon as you say it is, they're getting even further ahead by lacking a Strength score. How does that work out? A nonability in Strength means that a creature "can't exert force." Why then should being able to exert force have any bearing on accurately touching someone? Why would being strong make a character better at making contact with something than being nimble? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Touch attack specifics
Top