Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Touch of Healing [Reserve] feat from Complete Champion Excerpt
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Syltorian" data-source="post: 3510499" data-attributes="member: 17406"><p>Or, given that many of the other feats in the same category work only for those with access to a certain domain, maybe it will work only for clerics with access to the Healing Domain. That's my suspicion (or rather, the hope I cling to). </p><p></p><p>My problem with this (should there be no more limits than what the preview say) is not so much rules but flavour. I like the more gritty and dangerous side of things, where wounds and injuries do not get healed as easily. It adds more to the athmosphere of things; it is already difficult enough, at times, to get people to take death seriously with the resurrection spells out there. </p><p></p><p>As someone mentioned, this means that every town with a good cleric can live on without fearing injuries anymore. Unless they take you straight down to -10. The good cleric does not have the excuse 'I have to save my power just in case I really need it' anymore, if this is, like other reserve feats, is unlimited and unrestricted. In Eberron, for instance, this would make it really difficult for Jorasco - the clergy would heal without asking money, without spending any resources themselves, without having to manage their resources. </p><p></p><p>I also see this as stepping on the paladin's toes, and anyone else with lay on hands. Okay, so they can heal more hitpoints at one go, and use it to damage undead in combat. But, again, flavourwise this ability seems laughable. The cleric now can lay on hands better, and in the situation most people will be familiar with - few commoners run around needing to be healed 40 hp in one go - they'll just have less respect for the pally, by comparison. </p><p></p><p>Thus, if there is no further limit to the feat - and I suspect there must be - I will either limit it to those with access to the Healing Domain (their domain has never been very attractive, imho, anyway), or else to members of House Jorasco with the dragonmark as a requirement. </p><p></p><p>Also, someone pointed out on the WotC boards that clerics do not even have to prepare a cure spell to be able to use this field (again, assuming the text does not impose any limits; something which, again, I do not believe or want to believe). They can cast cure spell spontaneously, which is enough to satisfy the requirements for reserve feats so far. Thus, as long as a cleric has a single spell available to cast, he'll be able to heal people.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Syltorian, post: 3510499, member: 17406"] Or, given that many of the other feats in the same category work only for those with access to a certain domain, maybe it will work only for clerics with access to the Healing Domain. That's my suspicion (or rather, the hope I cling to). My problem with this (should there be no more limits than what the preview say) is not so much rules but flavour. I like the more gritty and dangerous side of things, where wounds and injuries do not get healed as easily. It adds more to the athmosphere of things; it is already difficult enough, at times, to get people to take death seriously with the resurrection spells out there. As someone mentioned, this means that every town with a good cleric can live on without fearing injuries anymore. Unless they take you straight down to -10. The good cleric does not have the excuse 'I have to save my power just in case I really need it' anymore, if this is, like other reserve feats, is unlimited and unrestricted. In Eberron, for instance, this would make it really difficult for Jorasco - the clergy would heal without asking money, without spending any resources themselves, without having to manage their resources. I also see this as stepping on the paladin's toes, and anyone else with lay on hands. Okay, so they can heal more hitpoints at one go, and use it to damage undead in combat. But, again, flavourwise this ability seems laughable. The cleric now can lay on hands better, and in the situation most people will be familiar with - few commoners run around needing to be healed 40 hp in one go - they'll just have less respect for the pally, by comparison. Thus, if there is no further limit to the feat - and I suspect there must be - I will either limit it to those with access to the Healing Domain (their domain has never been very attractive, imho, anyway), or else to members of House Jorasco with the dragonmark as a requirement. Also, someone pointed out on the WotC boards that clerics do not even have to prepare a cure spell to be able to use this field (again, assuming the text does not impose any limits; something which, again, I do not believe or want to believe). They can cast cure spell spontaneously, which is enough to satisfy the requirements for reserve feats so far. Thus, as long as a cleric has a single spell available to cast, he'll be able to heal people. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Touch of Healing [Reserve] feat from Complete Champion Excerpt
Top