Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Toxicity in the Fandom
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CleverNickName" data-source="post: 8705982" data-attributes="member: 50987"><p>Well, a lot of folks misuse the word 'inclusive' to indicate matters of personal preference.</p><p></p><p>There's the mentality of "I don't like (Thing), therefore (Thing) needs to be removed." I'm not sure why this escalates so quickly, but it seems to come from the fear that if more and more people keep talking about how much they like (Thing), the publishers might make more of it. And for certain personality types, this is the worst that can happen. They don't want the hobby to change, for whatever reason, so they undermine all attempts to change it. They start rumors and arguments, belittle others, kill discussions, you've seen them. It's not quite the same thing as "not being inclusive," but it has the same roots. It's still "harmful or unpleasant in a pervasive or insidious way," which is one definition of the word Toxic.</p><p></p><p>It's not the same thing as wanting to remove certain people from the game. There are people in our hobby who genuinely believe that only certain people are allowed to be fans, only certain people are allowed to have a voice in the room, only certain people are allowed to play. (These arguments are written in the language of Mordor, which I will not utter here.) You've seen the threads and the mod warnings, you know what I'm talking about. The truth is that all people are allowed to play, and they're allowed to play the way they want...that is generally what people mean by "inclusivity in gaming."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CleverNickName, post: 8705982, member: 50987"] Well, a lot of folks misuse the word 'inclusive' to indicate matters of personal preference. There's the mentality of "I don't like (Thing), therefore (Thing) needs to be removed." I'm not sure why this escalates so quickly, but it seems to come from the fear that if more and more people keep talking about how much they like (Thing), the publishers might make more of it. And for certain personality types, this is the worst that can happen. They don't want the hobby to change, for whatever reason, so they undermine all attempts to change it. They start rumors and arguments, belittle others, kill discussions, you've seen them. It's not quite the same thing as "not being inclusive," but it has the same roots. It's still "harmful or unpleasant in a pervasive or insidious way," which is one definition of the word Toxic. It's not the same thing as wanting to remove certain people from the game. There are people in our hobby who genuinely believe that only certain people are allowed to be fans, only certain people are allowed to have a voice in the room, only certain people are allowed to play. (These arguments are written in the language of Mordor, which I will not utter here.) You've seen the threads and the mod warnings, you know what I'm talking about. The truth is that all people are allowed to play, and they're allowed to play the way they want...that is generally what people mean by "inclusivity in gaming." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Toxicity in the Fandom
Top