Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Toxicity in the Fandom
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 8706010" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>I agree with you about disparaging others, but I feel the majority of the times that someone is claiming that the Star Trek fan is bent out of shape over diversity and inclusion, that is just another case of disparaging others. </p><p></p><p>I'm not really a Star Trek fan so I don't even know what is going on in that community, but in the case of the sequel trilogy the majority of fans I knew weren't criticizing diversity and inclusion per se but tokenism. They were quick to point out (I think rightly) that it would be stupid to claim that the same people who loved Leia, Lando, Mace Windu and Padme as characters were racist if they didn't like Rey and Finn as characters. Among their complaints is that it seemed that characters like Finn were created solely to check a racial diversity check box with no clear idea by the writers what role that character was supposed to play in the story, and with the apparent understanding that "black man" was a personality and sufficient characterization that no further character building was needed. These critics to the extent that they cared about race at all tended to not at all be upset that there was a black actor in Star Wars but that a black actor was asked to play such a flimsy poorly written part as "Finn" solely because he was black and with no other apparent consideration. And they were equally angry to be told that if they thought Finn's motives weren't clearly explained, Finn's actions weren't logical, Finn's characterization made him seem to be stupid and unlikeable, and Finn was not contributing in any other way than the JarJar comic relief (speaking of embarrassing roles for a black man) that they were bad racist fans and should just shut up.</p><p></p><p>And some of this goes back to the marketing your new product by hating on the old one, in as much as some fans felt they were being told that the original films were racist/sexist and you should feel bad for liking them, as if strong female figures were somehow new to Star Wars (especially in Legends, this is a ridiculous claim).</p><p></p><p>I don't really know how much tokenism played a role in casting and hiring actors for the sequel movies, but I do know that Mace Windu and Lando Calrissian were for all they were supporting characters still much more strongly written than Finn was, and that Leia to me is a cooler character than Rey and Leia's treatment in The Force Awakens was terrible.</p><p></p><p>Isn't suggesting someone is racist about the strongest form of disparagement you can do in society? I don't like the whole "Either you loved the sequel trilogy or you are a racist." thing that seems to be going on in the Star Wars community.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 8706010, member: 4937"] I agree with you about disparaging others, but I feel the majority of the times that someone is claiming that the Star Trek fan is bent out of shape over diversity and inclusion, that is just another case of disparaging others. I'm not really a Star Trek fan so I don't even know what is going on in that community, but in the case of the sequel trilogy the majority of fans I knew weren't criticizing diversity and inclusion per se but tokenism. They were quick to point out (I think rightly) that it would be stupid to claim that the same people who loved Leia, Lando, Mace Windu and Padme as characters were racist if they didn't like Rey and Finn as characters. Among their complaints is that it seemed that characters like Finn were created solely to check a racial diversity check box with no clear idea by the writers what role that character was supposed to play in the story, and with the apparent understanding that "black man" was a personality and sufficient characterization that no further character building was needed. These critics to the extent that they cared about race at all tended to not at all be upset that there was a black actor in Star Wars but that a black actor was asked to play such a flimsy poorly written part as "Finn" solely because he was black and with no other apparent consideration. And they were equally angry to be told that if they thought Finn's motives weren't clearly explained, Finn's actions weren't logical, Finn's characterization made him seem to be stupid and unlikeable, and Finn was not contributing in any other way than the JarJar comic relief (speaking of embarrassing roles for a black man) that they were bad racist fans and should just shut up. And some of this goes back to the marketing your new product by hating on the old one, in as much as some fans felt they were being told that the original films were racist/sexist and you should feel bad for liking them, as if strong female figures were somehow new to Star Wars (especially in Legends, this is a ridiculous claim). I don't really know how much tokenism played a role in casting and hiring actors for the sequel movies, but I do know that Mace Windu and Lando Calrissian were for all they were supporting characters still much more strongly written than Finn was, and that Leia to me is a cooler character than Rey and Leia's treatment in The Force Awakens was terrible. Isn't suggesting someone is racist about the strongest form of disparagement you can do in society? I don't like the whole "Either you loved the sequel trilogy or you are a racist." thing that seems to be going on in the Star Wars community. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Toxicity in the Fandom
Top