Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
TPK Your Entire Party
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Seeten" data-source="post: 3278276" data-attributes="member: 27186"><p>I dont believe I mentioned CN anywhere. </p><p></p><p>Having a personality does not mean CN. If a character can not behave like a real person because of a squiggle on a character sheet that looks like this: "CG" then I'd say someone is missing out.</p><p></p><p>I'd consider myself N in real life. I've done LG things, I've done CG things, I've done MANY LE things, and I've done some nasty stuff I shouldnt have done thats probably NE. I've done some NG stuff too. Does this mean if I were a character, I ought to be CN? No. It means I am me, and being N doesnt mean I act the same way all the time. Different stimulus and circumstances motivate me differently and cause different reactions. In some cases I respond well, in others, I get nasty. Does this mean I'm not a believable character in real life?</p><p></p><p>Clearly thats preposterous.</p><p></p><p>On the subject of alignment, I play characters with personalities, who are in depth, and have goals and motivations. If a character does something LE, and is normally NG, chances are its still in personality.</p><p></p><p>Further, since you and Karinsdad are so into citing the source material, lets cite some source material myself:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Note the phrasing of several key areas.</p><p></p><p>1) Alignment is a tool for developing your character’s identity. It is not a straitjacket for restricting your character.</p><p></p><p>2) Each alignment represents a broad range of personality types or personal philosophies, so two characters of the same alignment can still be quite different from each other. In addition, few people are completely consistent.</p><p></p><p>All of the statements I have made very simply fall into both of these categories. I find all attempts to make alignment into a straightjacket by using the rules citations to be an egregious misquoting of the rules themselves, which in fact, state the opposite.</p><p></p><p>for almost all PC's I play, as I have now stated many, many times, I work WITH the DM, and the other players, to play something that works in the group. Since our group is mature, and does not use the alignment rules as a straightjacket, and is happy enough to work together for common benefit, we have no issue deciding these things together, and further, why in the nine hells should I care even if I am "given an alignment change". Even as a Paladin, and losing my paladin powers, if its in character to do the action, I'm going to do it. I wouldnt act out of character for some in game benefit. Either the character is who it is, or I'm there to roll dice and nothing else.</p><p></p><p>I can play World of Warcraft any time I feel like not roleplaying, so I don't see how being there to roll dice works for me.</p><p></p><p>If I were a fighter, or a rogue, would it offend you if I were playing in your game if I left alignment off the sheet entirely? I mean, if you said, "I dont care what alignment you play" and I simply went ahead and played a character, you could tell me my alignment for me, and then change it whenever you felt it was differing from the original, right? Would anyone care what the alignment actually was, if the character was internally consistent? I sure wouldnt.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, alignment is not a straightjacket, per both the phb, the dmg, and the srd, so nobody I know in RL, or online(ENWorld IRC) actually uses it as such, and therefore I find all this straightjacketing into the alignment written on your sheet to be bizarre, contrary, and further demanding you behave according to exact stricture of the alignment written in the phb, per Karinsdad's post on what each alignment says, word for word, and if you deviate you are somehow playing the alignment wrong, baffles me. I'm done arguing about it, mostly, because its now dramatically offtopic, but suffice to say, I don't understand where you guys are coming from, and evil characters are easily playable in groups where the character is playing, not some archetypal alignment system/scheme is played. I dont know what would happen if everyone had to behave as an exact archetype, I have no experience with it, and couldnt begin to conceive of a fun character in that milieu.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Seeten, post: 3278276, member: 27186"] I dont believe I mentioned CN anywhere. Having a personality does not mean CN. If a character can not behave like a real person because of a squiggle on a character sheet that looks like this: "CG" then I'd say someone is missing out. I'd consider myself N in real life. I've done LG things, I've done CG things, I've done MANY LE things, and I've done some nasty stuff I shouldnt have done thats probably NE. I've done some NG stuff too. Does this mean if I were a character, I ought to be CN? No. It means I am me, and being N doesnt mean I act the same way all the time. Different stimulus and circumstances motivate me differently and cause different reactions. In some cases I respond well, in others, I get nasty. Does this mean I'm not a believable character in real life? Clearly thats preposterous. On the subject of alignment, I play characters with personalities, who are in depth, and have goals and motivations. If a character does something LE, and is normally NG, chances are its still in personality. Further, since you and Karinsdad are so into citing the source material, lets cite some source material myself: Note the phrasing of several key areas. 1) Alignment is a tool for developing your character’s identity. It is not a straitjacket for restricting your character. 2) Each alignment represents a broad range of personality types or personal philosophies, so two characters of the same alignment can still be quite different from each other. In addition, few people are completely consistent. All of the statements I have made very simply fall into both of these categories. I find all attempts to make alignment into a straightjacket by using the rules citations to be an egregious misquoting of the rules themselves, which in fact, state the opposite. for almost all PC's I play, as I have now stated many, many times, I work WITH the DM, and the other players, to play something that works in the group. Since our group is mature, and does not use the alignment rules as a straightjacket, and is happy enough to work together for common benefit, we have no issue deciding these things together, and further, why in the nine hells should I care even if I am "given an alignment change". Even as a Paladin, and losing my paladin powers, if its in character to do the action, I'm going to do it. I wouldnt act out of character for some in game benefit. Either the character is who it is, or I'm there to roll dice and nothing else. I can play World of Warcraft any time I feel like not roleplaying, so I don't see how being there to roll dice works for me. If I were a fighter, or a rogue, would it offend you if I were playing in your game if I left alignment off the sheet entirely? I mean, if you said, "I dont care what alignment you play" and I simply went ahead and played a character, you could tell me my alignment for me, and then change it whenever you felt it was differing from the original, right? Would anyone care what the alignment actually was, if the character was internally consistent? I sure wouldnt. Anyway, alignment is not a straightjacket, per both the phb, the dmg, and the srd, so nobody I know in RL, or online(ENWorld IRC) actually uses it as such, and therefore I find all this straightjacketing into the alignment written on your sheet to be bizarre, contrary, and further demanding you behave according to exact stricture of the alignment written in the phb, per Karinsdad's post on what each alignment says, word for word, and if you deviate you are somehow playing the alignment wrong, baffles me. I'm done arguing about it, mostly, because its now dramatically offtopic, but suffice to say, I don't understand where you guys are coming from, and evil characters are easily playable in groups where the character is playing, not some archetypal alignment system/scheme is played. I dont know what would happen if everyone had to behave as an exact archetype, I have no experience with it, and couldnt begin to conceive of a fun character in that milieu. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
TPK Your Entire Party
Top