Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Tracking Alignment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Markn" data-source="post: 1901620" data-attributes="member: 21827"><p><strong>Alignment</strong></p><p></p><p>RillianPA, much of your statements make sense. However, as every character is unique, so too is the alignment adjustments you make for that character. With the system I use, I find that some characters adjust 1 or 2 boxes in a session while others don't adjust at all. Then the next session those same characters go back in the other direction and in the grand scheme have not moved at all. </p><p></p><p>I think much of the subjectivity of alignment views are thus nullified as you not only take into account things that go against alignment but you reward them with acts within their alignment which helps keep them where they think they are. Again, long term data should support that it is less and less subjective because really it takes a LOT of actions (or several major actions) to switch an alignment. By no means do I think this system is for everyone. Player - DM trust is important and although our alignment views differ from player to player and in some cases there is a massive difference in opinion, our group has accepted the current system. In fact, most cases when alignment changes have occured the rest of the group have noticed the transgressions and can pretty much guess that it happened. I suppose a case could be made that if it is just the DM that sees it then there needs to be a discussion between the group and the players.</p><p></p><p>The other thing to mention is that alignment in 3.5 is the most abstract it has ever been. There are no penalties in the rules for changing alignment (other than clerics and paladins and the like). It forces a player to actually roleplay an alignment change if they want one...they actively have to work towards it. There is no 'I decided I want to be Chaotic Good instead of being Lawful Good'. This change isn't instantaneous in the game (or at least shouldn't be) nor is it in real life. Think about your views now as opposed to 2 years ago on what is right and wrong, things you did then vs. things you do now or even the reasons you did things vs. those reasons now. Peoples perceptions of things change and it is a result of things you have done in the past or things that have been done to you. The same premise appllies to a character and it is the long term that counts. Not the basis of 1 or 2 things. Ultimately, your alignment is really how others percieve you and not how you percieve yourself. Some may disagree with this statement and thats ok. Just be aware that those 2 perceptions are very different. The best you can do as a player is explain your motivations to the DM and from there the DM decides if it is out of alignment or not.</p><p></p><p>Having said all this it really is up to every group to decide how they will adjudicate alignment actions. Maybe a DM should tell the player that he is on the verge of changing alignment. Maybe he shouldn't. That really is for everyone to decide.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Markn, post: 1901620, member: 21827"] [b]Alignment[/b] RillianPA, much of your statements make sense. However, as every character is unique, so too is the alignment adjustments you make for that character. With the system I use, I find that some characters adjust 1 or 2 boxes in a session while others don't adjust at all. Then the next session those same characters go back in the other direction and in the grand scheme have not moved at all. I think much of the subjectivity of alignment views are thus nullified as you not only take into account things that go against alignment but you reward them with acts within their alignment which helps keep them where they think they are. Again, long term data should support that it is less and less subjective because really it takes a LOT of actions (or several major actions) to switch an alignment. By no means do I think this system is for everyone. Player - DM trust is important and although our alignment views differ from player to player and in some cases there is a massive difference in opinion, our group has accepted the current system. In fact, most cases when alignment changes have occured the rest of the group have noticed the transgressions and can pretty much guess that it happened. I suppose a case could be made that if it is just the DM that sees it then there needs to be a discussion between the group and the players. The other thing to mention is that alignment in 3.5 is the most abstract it has ever been. There are no penalties in the rules for changing alignment (other than clerics and paladins and the like). It forces a player to actually roleplay an alignment change if they want one...they actively have to work towards it. There is no 'I decided I want to be Chaotic Good instead of being Lawful Good'. This change isn't instantaneous in the game (or at least shouldn't be) nor is it in real life. Think about your views now as opposed to 2 years ago on what is right and wrong, things you did then vs. things you do now or even the reasons you did things vs. those reasons now. Peoples perceptions of things change and it is a result of things you have done in the past or things that have been done to you. The same premise appllies to a character and it is the long term that counts. Not the basis of 1 or 2 things. Ultimately, your alignment is really how others percieve you and not how you percieve yourself. Some may disagree with this statement and thats ok. Just be aware that those 2 perceptions are very different. The best you can do as a player is explain your motivations to the DM and from there the DM decides if it is out of alignment or not. Having said all this it really is up to every group to decide how they will adjudicate alignment actions. Maybe a DM should tell the player that he is on the verge of changing alignment. Maybe he shouldn't. That really is for everyone to decide. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Tracking Alignment
Top