Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Archive Forums
Hosted Forums
Personal & Hosted Forums
Hosted Publisher Forums
Bad Axe Games Hosted Forum
TRAILBLAZER - PDF Release - Discussion/Questions/Errata
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wulf Ratbane" data-source="post: 4935990" data-attributes="member: 94"><p>This would be one of those times I should have included a design note-- but the note is longer than the rules change.</p><p></p><p>"Cleaving Strike" is more important than you may think. </p><p></p><p>One of the problems with fighters (and I include all melee classes under that term for now) is that as they increase in level, they don't gain anywhere near the same effectiveness <em><strong>per action</strong></em> as the spellcasters.</p><p></p><p>I cannot emphasize this enough (though it shows up in my thinking on elite and solo creatures): There is no single factor more important to balance in D&D than the <em>economy of actions</em>.</p><p></p><p>[sblock]The economy of actions is also one of the advantages behind the "Big Six;" as (I think it was) Andy Collins rightly pointed out. The Big Six are great choices because they do what they do without you having to spend an action to activate them. They are always on, always working for you.[/sblock]</p><p></p><p>This ultimately relates back to Lanchester's Square Law (and I'm working on a long design primer on that, for folks who are interested); and it's related to one of the idiosyncrasies of hit points: a creature with 1 hit point is as effective and deadly as a creature at full health.</p><p></p><p>So when the fighter spends his one and only action to attack that creature at death's door, any damage above and beyond what's necessary to drop the creature is wasted.</p><p></p><p>If you're following me so far, you should be ahead of me at this point. </p><p></p><p>In order for the fighter to get the full benefit of his action (and then some), it's important that he get another attack when he drops a creature.</p><p></p><p>In fact, if I had my druthers, ALL characters would get Power Attack and Cleave for free. But barring that, the combat exploits that "duplicate" a gimped version of these feats are really more important than you might think.</p><p></p><p>(Power Attack works similarly, in that as a fighter levels up, his attack bonus outstrips what is necessary to strike most of his foes; if he has no way to convert that extra attack bonus into damage, then his BAB increase is of no value to him.)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I never actually went through a rigorous analysis of the PF classes. I think there's a philosophical difference in the design: the PF classes add more interesting options that are divergent from the existing core rules (rage or ki points as an early example); whereas I tried to expand the classes first along the spine, and then primarily using the same design "language" that already existed (bonus feats, expanding existing class features from class to class, etc.).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wulf Ratbane, post: 4935990, member: 94"] This would be one of those times I should have included a design note-- but the note is longer than the rules change. "Cleaving Strike" is more important than you may think. One of the problems with fighters (and I include all melee classes under that term for now) is that as they increase in level, they don't gain anywhere near the same effectiveness [i][B]per action[/B][/I] as the spellcasters. I cannot emphasize this enough (though it shows up in my thinking on elite and solo creatures): There is no single factor more important to balance in D&D than the [I]economy of actions[/I]. [sblock]The economy of actions is also one of the advantages behind the "Big Six;" as (I think it was) Andy Collins rightly pointed out. The Big Six are great choices because they do what they do without you having to spend an action to activate them. They are always on, always working for you.[/sblock] This ultimately relates back to Lanchester's Square Law (and I'm working on a long design primer on that, for folks who are interested); and it's related to one of the idiosyncrasies of hit points: a creature with 1 hit point is as effective and deadly as a creature at full health. So when the fighter spends his one and only action to attack that creature at death's door, any damage above and beyond what's necessary to drop the creature is wasted. If you're following me so far, you should be ahead of me at this point. In order for the fighter to get the full benefit of his action (and then some), it's important that he get another attack when he drops a creature. In fact, if I had my druthers, ALL characters would get Power Attack and Cleave for free. But barring that, the combat exploits that "duplicate" a gimped version of these feats are really more important than you might think. (Power Attack works similarly, in that as a fighter levels up, his attack bonus outstrips what is necessary to strike most of his foes; if he has no way to convert that extra attack bonus into damage, then his BAB increase is of no value to him.) I never actually went through a rigorous analysis of the PF classes. I think there's a philosophical difference in the design: the PF classes add more interesting options that are divergent from the existing core rules (rage or ki points as an early example); whereas I tried to expand the classes first along the spine, and then primarily using the same design "language" that already existed (bonus feats, expanding existing class features from class to class, etc.). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Archive Forums
Hosted Forums
Personal & Hosted Forums
Hosted Publisher Forums
Bad Axe Games Hosted Forum
TRAILBLAZER - PDF Release - Discussion/Questions/Errata
Top