Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Sakusammakko" data-source="post: 4947302" data-attributes="member: 75609">Podcast appearance has intrigued meWulf,After listening to you on the 3.5 Private Sanctuary podcast, I decided that I would check out Trailblazer.&nbsp; I don't even play 3.5 exactly.&nbsp; We play Castles &amp; Crusades.One of the nice things about the C&amp;C system is that I can port elements from other systems that I like.&nbsp; I'm looking forward to seeing what will be useful from Trailblazer.In general, I want to keep an old school feel while keeping the mechanics somewhat simple.&nbsp; I don't want to drop a load of rules on my players.&nbsp; I'd prefer to use rulings that give them a sense of what actions are more likely to lead to success than others, but that they should still try anything.As soon as I get paid, I'm buying the pdf.&nbsp; I'd be happy to share what elements I like.BTW, you sound much more mild mannered on the podcast than your forum posts would suggest.R</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Sakusammakko, post: 4947302, member: 75609"] [b]Podcast appearance has intrigued me[/b] Wulf, After listening to you on the 3.5 Private Sanctuary podcast, I decided that I would check out Trailblazer. I don't even play 3.5 exactly. We play Castles & Crusades. One of the nice things about the C&C system is that I can port elements from other systems that I like. I'm looking forward to seeing what will be useful from Trailblazer. In general, I want to keep an old school feel while keeping the mechanics somewhat simple. I don't want to drop a load of rules on my players. I'd prefer to use rulings that give them a sense of what actions are more likely to lead to success than others, but that they should still try anything. As soon as I get paid, I'm buying the pdf. I'd be happy to share what elements I like. BTW, you sound much more mild mannered on the podcast than your forum posts would suggest. R [/QUOTE]

Verification