Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
[Trailer] World War Z
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aaron L" data-source="post: 6047629" data-attributes="member: 926"><p>Philosophical Zombies. A human body which is not sentient, not sapient, and doesn't experience consciousness, but acts like it does, and with no way to tell that it isn't really a person with conscious experience. It's a concept that's gotten kinda popular to discuss in the circles of philosophy and artificial intelligence (and in the philosophy OF artificial intelligence.) It's used by some philosophers in thought experiments to debate whether consciousness is a physical function of the body/brain, or it exists on a separate, metaphysical level. It is used to debate whether it is even logically possible to exist or not. It... can get really esoteric and bizarre. </p><p></p><p>It's basically just a fancy term for a person who doesn't have a soul, but who you can't in any way DETERMINE doesn't have a soul.</p><p></p><p>I sometimes imagine panels of Wizards, Clerics, and Psionicists debating the topic. It makes it more fun. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> The debate would, of course, be based on Knowledge: Arcana, Knowledge: The Planes, and Knowledge: Religion. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> </p><p></p><p>Remember that episode of ST: TNG where they put Data on trial to determine if he had legal rights, or was just a machine and therefore the property of Starfleet? That's pretty much the debate in a nutshell.</p><p></p><p>I'm of the opinion that it is not logically possible, and is a completely ridiculous and inane concept. But it does have some possible consequences for future developments in artificial intelligence. It's like debating whether or not an artificially intelligent computer with the same discernible level of intelligence as a human (if/when we ever get there) would have rights as a person or not. </p><p></p><p>The people who argue for the existence of P-Zombies say no, because the computer wouldn't actually have conscious experience on the "metaphysical" level, and therefore wouldn't really be conscious, even though it seemed like it did in every way. I believe that if a computer acted in every way like it was conscious, and there was no possible way to determine that it did not have consciousness, than it IS conscious. </p><p></p><p>The whole concept is a bizarre mixture of very important/inconsequential/fascinating/frustrating and stupid. Like a lot of philosophy. That's what makes it so fun.</p><p></p><p>At one point I thought about trying to figure out the Pathfinder stats of a P-Zombie, wondering what effect lacking metaphysical consciousness (or a soul) would have. I remembered the kir-lanan from the Forgotten Realms, which were beings that didn't have souls, and considered making P-Zombies immune to divine magic, or at least having very high resistance. But then I realized that <em>that</em> in itself would be a way to distinguish the P-Zombie, so that idea wouldn't work. Then I wondered if even the gods could determine a P-Zombie, and what implications that might have! And then I considered that maybe I was thinking about the whole thing too much. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></p><p></p><p>I came to the conclusion that, in D20, if there isn't a measurable difference you can define with stats, then there <em>is</em> no difference; just like in real life. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aaron L, post: 6047629, member: 926"] Philosophical Zombies. A human body which is not sentient, not sapient, and doesn't experience consciousness, but acts like it does, and with no way to tell that it isn't really a person with conscious experience. It's a concept that's gotten kinda popular to discuss in the circles of philosophy and artificial intelligence (and in the philosophy OF artificial intelligence.) It's used by some philosophers in thought experiments to debate whether consciousness is a physical function of the body/brain, or it exists on a separate, metaphysical level. It is used to debate whether it is even logically possible to exist or not. It... can get really esoteric and bizarre. It's basically just a fancy term for a person who doesn't have a soul, but who you can't in any way DETERMINE doesn't have a soul. I sometimes imagine panels of Wizards, Clerics, and Psionicists debating the topic. It makes it more fun. :) The debate would, of course, be based on Knowledge: Arcana, Knowledge: The Planes, and Knowledge: Religion. ;) Remember that episode of ST: TNG where they put Data on trial to determine if he had legal rights, or was just a machine and therefore the property of Starfleet? That's pretty much the debate in a nutshell. I'm of the opinion that it is not logically possible, and is a completely ridiculous and inane concept. But it does have some possible consequences for future developments in artificial intelligence. It's like debating whether or not an artificially intelligent computer with the same discernible level of intelligence as a human (if/when we ever get there) would have rights as a person or not. The people who argue for the existence of P-Zombies say no, because the computer wouldn't actually have conscious experience on the "metaphysical" level, and therefore wouldn't really be conscious, even though it seemed like it did in every way. I believe that if a computer acted in every way like it was conscious, and there was no possible way to determine that it did not have consciousness, than it IS conscious. The whole concept is a bizarre mixture of very important/inconsequential/fascinating/frustrating and stupid. Like a lot of philosophy. That's what makes it so fun. At one point I thought about trying to figure out the Pathfinder stats of a P-Zombie, wondering what effect lacking metaphysical consciousness (or a soul) would have. I remembered the kir-lanan from the Forgotten Realms, which were beings that didn't have souls, and considered making P-Zombies immune to divine magic, or at least having very high resistance. But then I realized that [I]that[/I] in itself would be a way to distinguish the P-Zombie, so that idea wouldn't work. Then I wondered if even the gods could determine a P-Zombie, and what implications that might have! And then I considered that maybe I was thinking about the whole thing too much. :p I came to the conclusion that, in D20, if there isn't a measurable difference you can define with stats, then there [I]is[/I] no difference; just like in real life. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
[Trailer] World War Z
Top