Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Hriston" data-source="post: 7502136" data-attributes="member: 6787503"><p>It's actually more expensive in a straight gp to gp comparison. In adapting this, I reduced costs to 60% of what they are in AD&D. Also, if I remember correctly, training time could be up to four times as long if the DM judged that you didn't play your character true to his/her class archetype. So potentially costs could be 6 2/3 times what I decided on here, but I think using 60% of the gp values from AD&D 1st Ed. is about right for 5E to get the same effect, which is a pretty hefty drain on the PCs' gold reserves. Notice that training times themselves are mostly lower than the 5E DMG system.</p></blockquote><p></p>