Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="jontherev" data-source="post: 3632443" data-attributes="member: 1451">Right, that's the same interpretation that I get.&nbsp; I just don't like it.&nbsp; I guess it's a good thing that I'm the DM.&nbsp; I mean, I'm willing to suspend my disbelief a lot, but allowing great swords and scythes the ability to bypass bludgeoning damage reduction and still do the same amount of damage, with the same crit multiplier...well, that just doesn't make any sense to me.&nbsp; I guess that's why they call it magic...it's not meant to make sense.&nbsp; In any case, I think it's a bit much for the +2 cost.&nbsp; Maybe +3 is more in line?&nbsp; I'd be interested in hearing others' opinions on whether a +2 cost is sufficient to pretty much ignore any enemy's (even Epic DR) damage reduction.What would have made more sense to me, is if they had the Morphing enhancement as a synergy prerequisite.&nbsp; And THEN, yes, your item morphs into whatever weapon type you need, and it also changes into whatever material type you need.&nbsp; I think this is the house rule I will use.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="jontherev, post: 3632443, member: 1451"] Right, that's the same interpretation that I get. I just don't like it. I guess it's a good thing that I'm the DM. I mean, I'm willing to suspend my disbelief a lot, but allowing great swords and scythes the ability to bypass bludgeoning damage reduction and still do the same amount of damage, with the same crit multiplier...well, that just doesn't make any sense to me. I guess that's why they call it magic...it's not meant to make sense. In any case, I think it's a bit much for the +2 cost. Maybe +3 is more in line? I'd be interested in hearing others' opinions on whether a +2 cost is sufficient to pretty much ignore any enemy's (even Epic DR) damage reduction. What would have made more sense to me, is if they had the Morphing enhancement as a synergy prerequisite. And THEN, yes, your item morphs into whatever weapon type you need, and it also changes into whatever material type you need. I think this is the house rule I will use. [/QUOTE]

Verification