Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Traps preview
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jer" data-source="post: 4211958" data-attributes="member: 19857"><p>Not to be mean, but this is why Spot and Search checks have a bad rap in 3e. Making players roll to see obvious things is one of those things that makes my head hurt (and makes me want to hurt the DM I'm playing with). If there's something obvious in the room, the players need to be told about it. If they say "I look under the bed" and you know that there's a box under the bed, making them make a "Search" roll to find it is not only irritating, it's just plain weird.</p><p></p><p>Now onto the actual example you're butchering here - the Perception check specifically says "you spot the strange gem". It doesn't say "you see the pedestal". There's a lot of leeway in the reading of "you spot the strange gem" - the way I'd run it would be along these lines:</p><p></p><p>Me: ... in the center of the room you see a large pedestal engraved with skeletal figures around its base. Atop the pedestal is a large mutl-faceted crystal.</p><p>Player: I want to examine the crystal</p><p>Me: Does that mean you're going to try to pick it up?</p><p>Player: NO! I'm not even leaving the doorway - I just want to see what I can tell from here.</p><p></p><p>[Make secret Perception check or have player make perception check - it fails]</p><p>Me: It looks like it's probably too big to be a gem, unless it's a really expensive one. But you can't really tell much more than that from where you're standing.</p><p></p><p>[or, if the Perception check succeeds]</p><p>Me: There's something ... strange about the crystal. At first you thought it was reflecting some of the light from your torches, but as you inspect it, you could swear that it's actually glowing on its own. It's definitely weirding you out a bit.</p><p></p><p>Now, on the other hand, given the text description of the trap, I'd probably make the gem much smaller and embed it in a statue. That makes the reading of the line "you notice the strange gem" make a bit more sense - if you're standing 25' away from a large statue, you may not notice that one of its eyes has a small blue gemstone in it. But as it stands there's nothing wrong with the trap description - it just assumes that there's going to be a DM there to interpret it for the party at the table.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jer, post: 4211958, member: 19857"] Not to be mean, but this is why Spot and Search checks have a bad rap in 3e. Making players roll to see obvious things is one of those things that makes my head hurt (and makes me want to hurt the DM I'm playing with). If there's something obvious in the room, the players need to be told about it. If they say "I look under the bed" and you know that there's a box under the bed, making them make a "Search" roll to find it is not only irritating, it's just plain weird. Now onto the actual example you're butchering here - the Perception check specifically says "you spot the strange gem". It doesn't say "you see the pedestal". There's a lot of leeway in the reading of "you spot the strange gem" - the way I'd run it would be along these lines: Me: ... in the center of the room you see a large pedestal engraved with skeletal figures around its base. Atop the pedestal is a large mutl-faceted crystal. Player: I want to examine the crystal Me: Does that mean you're going to try to pick it up? Player: NO! I'm not even leaving the doorway - I just want to see what I can tell from here. [Make secret Perception check or have player make perception check - it fails] Me: It looks like it's probably too big to be a gem, unless it's a really expensive one. But you can't really tell much more than that from where you're standing. [or, if the Perception check succeeds] Me: There's something ... strange about the crystal. At first you thought it was reflecting some of the light from your torches, but as you inspect it, you could swear that it's actually glowing on its own. It's definitely weirding you out a bit. Now, on the other hand, given the text description of the trap, I'd probably make the gem much smaller and embed it in a statue. That makes the reading of the line "you notice the strange gem" make a bit more sense - if you're standing 25' away from a large statue, you may not notice that one of its eyes has a small blue gemstone in it. But as it stands there's nothing wrong with the trap description - it just assumes that there's going to be a DM there to interpret it for the party at the table. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Traps preview
Top