Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Treantmonklvl20" data-source="post: 7267542" data-attributes="member: 55582">You seemed to be under the false impression that if you feel insulted, there has been an ad-hominem logical fallacy committed.  I was correcting you, because you made a mistake.I did not attack your character.  That would violate terms of service and would be irrelevant to our discussion.I did not attack your capabilities, though I'm going to in this post, because it is relevant to our discussion.I questioned your experience.  If someone was unaware that some roads are covered in gravel, I would question their driving experience.  If someone was unaware that some books have hard covers, I would question their reading experience.  If someone has never heard of single encounter days in official D&D products I will question their D&D experience.  Now if that driver then lectured me that gravel roads don't exist, except perhaps in my town, which is fine, but definitely not on any normal place, and they are offended I questioned their experience, and I commited an ad-hominem logical fallacy by doing so, well, I'm probably not investing much time in getting their driving tips, and the coversation is likely close to over.Our conversation is close to over.It is also complete and utter waste of your time and mine. Again.  My hopes are not high, but I will explain why you wasted our time...one more time.6 pages ago.  6 pages ago I asked for an answer to this one simple question, and now you are giving me graphs with the claim how a BS will still be standing when his party members go down.So now, after all these pages, now I'm going to attack your capabilities.I have asked the same question of you over and over.  I've tried rephrasing it, I've tried specifically asking for you not to change the subject to the BS not being hit in combat, yet you are still doing so.  I thought at first you might be unwilling to answer the question, but now I wonder about your capability to comprehend what is being asked, no matter how many times it is rephrased.It has been making me irritated, and by your tone, your irritation is also apparent, right up to the last post where you answered my question as to why a BS was swinging a sword by pointing out how a BS will still be standing when his party members go down.That is the reason our conversation is now over. I will not be blocking you, but I will no longer be responding to your posts.Also not an ad-hominem by the way.</blockquote>

Verification