Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="jiriku" data-source="post: 7470363" data-attributes="member: 6964378">I played a recent 5e campaign in which we were using the un-errata'd version of glyph, and based on the argument that tables are portable (our half--orc fighter frequently used them as thrown weapons), convinced him that applying a glyph "on a surface" that was portable could always trump the stationary requirement. This did lead to hand grenades and explosive cannon balls (we had an airship). It was good times, and kept the ship relevant at high levels and kept the melee fighters in the game against flying airborne enemies.But throughout, I had this dirty feeling that as the designated God wizard I was creating faux party balance by arranging things so that the BSFs didn't realize that they were just encounter furniture and the casters were doing all the heavy lifting. It should have been DM rulings maintaining party balance, not my actions as the player. But I suppose I'm wandering far afield now, as this is more about the endless fighter/wizard brouhaha rather than a good functional definition of "stationary." I've got a friend from my group coming over tonight; I'm going to show him what you wrote and ask his opinion. The guy's much smarter than me, it'll be interesting to see his take.</blockquote>