Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
trip, whip and twf
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jeff Wilder" data-source="post: 2465052" data-attributes="member: 5122"><p>Can you take the full attack action, make an attack, then quick-draw a shortsword with the off-hand and make an attack?</p><p></p><p>If not, why not? Show me the rule.</p><p></p><p>Your model contradicts the D&D general rule that one can attack, judge the effect, and then take a second attack if available. I'm trying to figure out what rule you've found that states that contradiction.</p><p></p><p>You said, "I'd allow him to draw a second weapon, as long as he doesn't wield two at the same time if he's already made an attack without taking TWF penalties."</p><p></p><p>So, to be clear, you'd allow someone who takes the full attack action to attack with the longsword (currently only wielding one weapon), drop the longsword as a free action (currently wielding no weapons), quick-draw the shortsword with the off-hand (currently wielding one weapon), and attack with the shortsword? And, since at no time is he "wield[ing] two [weapons] at the same time," he doesn't take TWF penalties. Right?</p><p></p><p>If this isn't what you said, how is it not permitted by what you've said?</p><p></p><p>Another question: How about the guy wielding the two-bladed sword? In your model, he can't attack once, then decide to take an off-hand attack, right?</p><p></p><p>So, to sum up:</p><p></p><p>In your model, the general rule that one can attack, judge the effect of the attack, and choose to attack again doesn't fully apply to two-weapon fighter, because ...</p><p></p><p>In your model, the general rule that one can attack with a weapon, then quick-draw a second weapon and attack with it doesn't apply to two-weapon fighters.</p><p></p><p>So to make your model work (sorta, I guess), you have to change two general rules of D&D combat. Right?</p><p></p><p>Whereas the alternative, my model, and Customer Service's model, says that as long as you accept the penalties for TWF on all attacks, you're eligible to take an extra attack with your off-hand.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jeff Wilder, post: 2465052, member: 5122"] Can you take the full attack action, make an attack, then quick-draw a shortsword with the off-hand and make an attack? If not, why not? Show me the rule. Your model contradicts the D&D general rule that one can attack, judge the effect, and then take a second attack if available. I'm trying to figure out what rule you've found that states that contradiction. You said, "I'd allow him to draw a second weapon, as long as he doesn't wield two at the same time if he's already made an attack without taking TWF penalties." So, to be clear, you'd allow someone who takes the full attack action to attack with the longsword (currently only wielding one weapon), drop the longsword as a free action (currently wielding no weapons), quick-draw the shortsword with the off-hand (currently wielding one weapon), and attack with the shortsword? And, since at no time is he "wield[ing] two [weapons] at the same time," he doesn't take TWF penalties. Right? If this isn't what you said, how is it not permitted by what you've said? Another question: How about the guy wielding the two-bladed sword? In your model, he can't attack once, then decide to take an off-hand attack, right? So, to sum up: In your model, the general rule that one can attack, judge the effect of the attack, and choose to attack again doesn't fully apply to two-weapon fighter, because ... In your model, the general rule that one can attack with a weapon, then quick-draw a second weapon and attack with it doesn't apply to two-weapon fighters. So to make your model work (sorta, I guess), you have to change two general rules of D&D combat. Right? Whereas the alternative, my model, and Customer Service's model, says that as long as you accept the penalties for TWF on all attacks, you're eligible to take an extra attack with your off-hand. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
trip, whip and twf
Top