Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"True Neutral": Bunk or Hogwash
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 9858901" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>So, I think it is helpful to think about what we mean by "True Neutrality"</p><p></p><p>Neutrality in general is indifference to all the other claims by all the other alignments. Neither in weal no woe, creation or destruction, self nor in community, objectivity nor subjectivity do neutrals find any real and absolute value. Instead, they find all value to be wholly circumstantial. Nothing is good nor evil except that circumstances make it so. They are pragmatists. Life has no purpose, neither does the destruction of life. Instead, everything is just about getting by and adapting to change. Change is neither good nor bad, it just is. Death is neither good nor bad, it just is. </p><p></p><p>We can easily imagine a being who has this perspective out of a lack of introspection or understanding about any deep philosophical matter. They aren't contemplative, they are just trying to get by amidst the complexity of reality. Carving out their little niche and trying not to get too involved in anything bigger themselves. 5e tends to call this brand of Neutrality - Unaligned. What it is really is just indifferent by happenstance or nature. You don't care enough to care.</p><p></p><p>By "True Neutral" we mean someone is philosophical about this state of affair and while indifferent to the claims of other alignments they are not passive in their response to the winds of change. They see the absolutism and extremism of all of the other alignments and their servants as being wrong and dangerous - even and including Good. It's that last one that is I think a sticking point for people. They try to rationalize it by saying, "Too much Good becomes Evil". This nonsense shows up in for example Dragonlance. A True Neutral person would not be convinced by this augment. Rather the True Neutral person has to believe that some amount of evil is better than none of it. That's a bit of an alien belief system, but it does show up both in the real world and in fiction. That is to say the True Neutral is not only rebelling against evil's end goal of infinite pain, infinite loss, total destruction, and to make everything not, but also against literal paradise of no unhappiness, unending growth, unending health, endless bounty and joy - not because they believe those things were evil but in some sense they believed them wrong anyway. The True Neutral has to honestly believe that paradise is made better if someone is unhappy in it, even if that someone is themselves. They wouldn't see a point in knocking it all down. But they would see a point in grief and loss being a part of existence, and something wrong with trying to end them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 9858901, member: 4937"] So, I think it is helpful to think about what we mean by "True Neutrality" Neutrality in general is indifference to all the other claims by all the other alignments. Neither in weal no woe, creation or destruction, self nor in community, objectivity nor subjectivity do neutrals find any real and absolute value. Instead, they find all value to be wholly circumstantial. Nothing is good nor evil except that circumstances make it so. They are pragmatists. Life has no purpose, neither does the destruction of life. Instead, everything is just about getting by and adapting to change. Change is neither good nor bad, it just is. Death is neither good nor bad, it just is. We can easily imagine a being who has this perspective out of a lack of introspection or understanding about any deep philosophical matter. They aren't contemplative, they are just trying to get by amidst the complexity of reality. Carving out their little niche and trying not to get too involved in anything bigger themselves. 5e tends to call this brand of Neutrality - Unaligned. What it is really is just indifferent by happenstance or nature. You don't care enough to care. By "True Neutral" we mean someone is philosophical about this state of affair and while indifferent to the claims of other alignments they are not passive in their response to the winds of change. They see the absolutism and extremism of all of the other alignments and their servants as being wrong and dangerous - even and including Good. It's that last one that is I think a sticking point for people. They try to rationalize it by saying, "Too much Good becomes Evil". This nonsense shows up in for example Dragonlance. A True Neutral person would not be convinced by this augment. Rather the True Neutral person has to believe that some amount of evil is better than none of it. That's a bit of an alien belief system, but it does show up both in the real world and in fiction. That is to say the True Neutral is not only rebelling against evil's end goal of infinite pain, infinite loss, total destruction, and to make everything not, but also against literal paradise of no unhappiness, unending growth, unending health, endless bounty and joy - not because they believe those things were evil but in some sense they believed them wrong anyway. The True Neutral has to honestly believe that paradise is made better if someone is unhappy in it, even if that someone is themselves. They wouldn't see a point in knocking it all down. But they would see a point in grief and loss being a part of existence, and something wrong with trying to end them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"True Neutral": Bunk or Hogwash
Top