Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
True Strike and Invisibility question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 156229" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>It goes one way and not the other because the column is titled “Miss Chance”. It is not titled “Concealment Factors”.</p><p></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>I think this is an exaggeration. One spell which usually isn’t studied negating total concealment for one character for one attack is hardly munchkin land. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes :rolleyes:" data-smilie="11"data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>No doubt about it. They are separate mechanics. This is apparent even without the section in the DMG (although the DMG indicates what the DCs are for locating the target). However, they are used at the exact same time when attacking a totally concealed character.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Think about it.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>If a character is 300 feet away from you, the “guess their location” chance is next to zero. So, the Miss Chance is approximately 100%-.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>The Miss Chance includes the 50% and it includes the chance of guessing correctly.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>If you guess incorrectly, you still miss, correct?</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>If you attempt a Listen check per the DMG, your chances of making it are 20+his move silent DC.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>If you attempt a Spot check per the DMG, your chances are fairly dismal.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>In either case, the chances of missing are huge. That might be why the “guess their location” is part of the Miss Chance column. Missing is not just your percentage chance, it is also your chance, regardless of mechanics you use (Scent, Spot, Listen, Guess) to pinpoint the target.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>But, if you negate the Miss Chance, then there is no chance of missing due to Miss Chance, which according to the column, includes the guessing of the location.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Missing due to rolling a one on the attack roll is NOT on that column and is not part of the Miss Chance. Hence, you could still miss by rolling a one.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Well, I think we beat this one to death. I think Miss Chance due to concealment includes all concealment factors and actually makes the spell worthwhile. Other people take the narrow view that Miss Chance only includes the percentage given in the table. I doubt we will ever convince each differently. C’est la guerre.</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 156229, member: 2011"] It goes one way and not the other because the column is titled “Miss Chance”. It is not titled “Concealment Factors”. [i] I think this is an exaggeration. One spell which usually isn’t studied negating total concealment for one character for one attack is hardly munchkin land. :rolleyes: No doubt about it. They are separate mechanics. This is apparent even without the section in the DMG (although the DMG indicates what the DCs are for locating the target). However, they are used at the exact same time when attacking a totally concealed character. Think about it. If a character is 300 feet away from you, the “guess their location” chance is next to zero. So, the Miss Chance is approximately 100%-. The Miss Chance includes the 50% and it includes the chance of guessing correctly. If you guess incorrectly, you still miss, correct? If you attempt a Listen check per the DMG, your chances of making it are 20+his move silent DC. If you attempt a Spot check per the DMG, your chances are fairly dismal. In either case, the chances of missing are huge. That might be why the “guess their location” is part of the Miss Chance column. Missing is not just your percentage chance, it is also your chance, regardless of mechanics you use (Scent, Spot, Listen, Guess) to pinpoint the target. But, if you negate the Miss Chance, then there is no chance of missing due to Miss Chance, which according to the column, includes the guessing of the location. Missing due to rolling a one on the attack roll is NOT on that column and is not part of the Miss Chance. Hence, you could still miss by rolling a one. Well, I think we beat this one to death. I think Miss Chance due to concealment includes all concealment factors and actually makes the spell worthwhile. Other people take the narrow view that Miss Chance only includes the percentage given in the table. I doubt we will ever convince each differently. C’est la guerre.[/i] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
True Strike and Invisibility question
Top