Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="IceBear" data-source="post: 157852" data-attributes="member: 1118">That's true too - nothing wrong with free thinking (didnt' mean to imply that there was).  Just because I made the tongue in cheek comment about people reading too much into the rules doesn't mean that I don't think people shouldn't question the rules - honest.  I had just finished a debate with one of the Maguses <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> who was try to say that since page 6 of the PHB defines the term "you" as being "your character" then the passage in the book where it states that you can't normally choose to take a partial action does apply to his players only to their characters, so his players could choose to take two partial actions per round.  After that, well, I kinda lost it on people reading a little too much into stuff. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />It's just that I've been there too.  I was with you 100% on the Mindblank vs True Strike issue (and I still think you're technically right by the spell descriptions), but I guess that lately I've been in the frame of mind that if an interpretation opens up a can of worms then I'll stick with the simpliest, "at face value" interreptation (which was why I ended up going with the Sage and not Monte on the Mind Blank ruling - even though by the letter of the spells I think Monte was right).IceBear</blockquote>

Verification