Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Minigiant" data-source="post: 8547217" data-attributes="member: 63508">I don't think Rage has the design space for:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Breath Weapon</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Wings</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Large size</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Eye rays</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Water breathing</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Scales or Hide</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Spines</li> </ul>It can do some things like elemental attacks or natural attacks. But a barbarian doesn't really shift to a different monstrous style of play.The idea is that such a character is still tinkering with the infancy of the next era of technology. Firearms existed in medieval times. They just stunkAlso D&D snatches up some aspects later than the medieval period of Europe Africa and Asia for the Rule of Fun.D&D is more Late Medieval Early Renaissance in rules.The D&D 5e nonmagical Tinker would be more warrior than expected due to the base weaknesses or unreliability of advanced tech balanced to the " of the time" tech. Especially with the expectations of combat prowess of all characters.</blockquote>