Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Truly Understanding the Martials & Casters discussion (+)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 8549605" data-attributes="member: 93670"><p>I think the pizza topping analogy is strained & off the mark at best. The intercharacter balance & question of where tradeoffs should come is too important to dismiss in that fashion becaus d&d is a game where everyone plays with a similarly equal character than falls apart if one class is overpowered from the others to such a degree that it's among the best at everything. Even if someone is sympathetic to improving fighter the question of how much to improve it depends on what tradeoffs are being made & without tradeoffs there needs to be an extremely strong case not being made.</p><p></p><p>A better analogy might be going to <a href="https://www.thecapitalgrille.com/menu-listing/cocktails#cocktails" target="_blank">capital griille</a> with friends & agreeing to split the bill, for those not familiar it's a famously expensive chain known for business lunches someone else pays for. The friends should be up front about things like "are we getting drinks" "entrees or just the early bird appetizer things?" & similar. These kinds of questions are akin to asking about the tradeoffs. If everyone agrees to drinks & orders a ~15-20$glass that's ok, but not so ok if bob doesn't mention that he's ordering a glass of macallan25 with three digits before the decimal or a 98$ bottle of wine. Likewise Alice ordering lobster & filet is different than the time Bob ordered the one non-shellfish thing at that seafood place due to a shellfish allergy even if it was a bit pricey.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Bob's macallen25 or 98$ bottle of wine is no good because it makes the friends no longer similarly on the bill like how they are at the table in d&d. The shellfish thing with Alice is likewise a good analogy because it's a very good reason like the beastmaster ranger's pet being shifted from almost useless at its intended purpose to being somewhat useful at it's purpose. We aren't talking about changing a poorly designed feature to bring value worth the cost, it's about things like fighters <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/truly-understanding-the-martials-casters-discussion.686063/post-8548141" target="_blank">getting to fly at level 11</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tetrasodium, post: 8549605, member: 93670"] I think the pizza topping analogy is strained & off the mark at best. The intercharacter balance & question of where tradeoffs should come is too important to dismiss in that fashion becaus d&d is a game where everyone plays with a similarly equal character than falls apart if one class is overpowered from the others to such a degree that it's among the best at everything. Even if someone is sympathetic to improving fighter the question of how much to improve it depends on what tradeoffs are being made & without tradeoffs there needs to be an extremely strong case not being made. A better analogy might be going to [URL='https://www.thecapitalgrille.com/menu-listing/cocktails#cocktails']capital griille[/URL] with friends & agreeing to split the bill, for those not familiar it's a famously expensive chain known for business lunches someone else pays for. The friends should be up front about things like "are we getting drinks" "entrees or just the early bird appetizer things?" & similar. These kinds of questions are akin to asking about the tradeoffs. If everyone agrees to drinks & orders a ~15-20$glass that's ok, but not so ok if bob doesn't mention that he's ordering a glass of macallan25 with three digits before the decimal or a 98$ bottle of wine. Likewise Alice ordering lobster & filet is different than the time Bob ordered the one non-shellfish thing at that seafood place due to a shellfish allergy even if it was a bit pricey. Bob's macallen25 or 98$ bottle of wine is no good because it makes the friends no longer similarly on the bill like how they are at the table in d&d. The shellfish thing with Alice is likewise a good analogy because it's a very good reason like the beastmaster ranger's pet being shifted from almost useless at its intended purpose to being somewhat useful at it's purpose. We aren't talking about changing a poorly designed feature to bring value worth the cost, it's about things like fighters [URL='https://www.enworld.org/threads/truly-understanding-the-martials-casters-discussion.686063/post-8548141']getting to fly at level 11[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Truly Understanding the Martials & Casters discussion (+)
Top