Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Truly Understanding the Martials & Casters discussion (+)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FrogReaver" data-source="post: 8554355" data-attributes="member: 6795602"><p>IMO, the difference between the wizard with feats and without is pretty negligible (outside concentration boosts).</p><p></p><p>Many tables play with feats so it's a reasonable assumption to include them. But that doesn't mean it would not be a reasonable assumption if they weren't included. It kind of seems like you are pushing for the only reasonable set of assumptions to be the ones that matches your playstyle. I just really don't think that's a good way to approach this exercise. The moment everyone starts doing that then we might as well pack up, because no ones assumptions are ever going to perfectly align and so we will just spend the rest of the thread fighting about which assumptions to use. </p><p></p><p>I firmly believe that your set of assumptions are reasonable, but I think the set Ezekiel and I are working out are reasonable as well and hopefully when we put this together it will be a better starting point than any single persons assumptions when it comes to exploring the question of Fighter damage vs Wizard damage. But as I keep noting it's at best a good starting point.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FrogReaver, post: 8554355, member: 6795602"] IMO, the difference between the wizard with feats and without is pretty negligible (outside concentration boosts). Many tables play with feats so it's a reasonable assumption to include them. But that doesn't mean it would not be a reasonable assumption if they weren't included. It kind of seems like you are pushing for the only reasonable set of assumptions to be the ones that matches your playstyle. I just really don't think that's a good way to approach this exercise. The moment everyone starts doing that then we might as well pack up, because no ones assumptions are ever going to perfectly align and so we will just spend the rest of the thread fighting about which assumptions to use. I firmly believe that your set of assumptions are reasonable, but I think the set Ezekiel and I are working out are reasonable as well and hopefully when we put this together it will be a better starting point than any single persons assumptions when it comes to exploring the question of Fighter damage vs Wizard damage. But as I keep noting it's at best a good starting point. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Truly Understanding the Martials & Casters discussion (+)
Top