Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Trying to make dual-wielding a bit better
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RandomUsernamehmimo71" data-source="post: 1171141" data-attributes="member: 9051"><p>Thanks for looking through that for me. I really appreciate it. I do have a couple of comments or replies, though.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>True, but keep in mind we're talking about a First Level Fighter here. That is all the attacks he could make during one round. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You're right in that I did not account for the +50% bonus for using the sword two handed initially. Good point. That throws off Every calculation of Long Sword further on.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Agreed. That's why I went into the Great sword below. </p><p>The reason I was looking at the Long sword versus two long swords was to establish a baseline... If TWF was so seriously borked that fighting with Two of Long Swords was worse than one Long Sword, then there would be a very serious problem. </p><p>But we need to start with that, as a base, and then expand upon it.</p><p></p><p>As it is, the fact that they are equal is damning evidence, but the greater maximum damage of TWF makes a possibility.. Until you start looking at a greatsword, as I did further on.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's true, but you're skipping ahead. I was first comparing a TWF fighter, to a fighter with a Great Sword, without Power Attack.</p><p></p><p> Each is a feat, and it's a fair comparison to compare them, as you suggest. In fact, I did exactly that later on.. But in testing, you want to examine one variable at a time. So I was, trying at least, to test TWF against the Great Sword, before introducing the Power Attack ont he Great Sword.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's true, but I was adding that to be able to later on discuss the posibility of modifying the Great Sword Crit range, to attempt to fix the problem. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It came out even for Average Damage, and a greater maximum. That is for comparing One Longsword WITHOUT powerattack to Two Long Swords, with TWF. </p><p></p><p>That being said, if you give the Long Sword Power Attack under the 3.5 rules, it does come out ahead. 5.75 damage with Power Attack with a Long Sword, and only 5.25 with TWF. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Thanks for the help. I'm a bit frustrated that I don't seem to understand WoTC motivations.. They aren't setting rules to make things balance out right (which simple math shows), and they aren't setting them to be ultra-realistic.. So I'm a bit at a loss as to how they derived their numbers..</p><p></p><p></p><p>Colin</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RandomUsernamehmimo71, post: 1171141, member: 9051"] Thanks for looking through that for me. I really appreciate it. I do have a couple of comments or replies, though. True, but keep in mind we're talking about a First Level Fighter here. That is all the attacks he could make during one round. You're right in that I did not account for the +50% bonus for using the sword two handed initially. Good point. That throws off Every calculation of Long Sword further on. Agreed. That's why I went into the Great sword below. The reason I was looking at the Long sword versus two long swords was to establish a baseline... If TWF was so seriously borked that fighting with Two of Long Swords was worse than one Long Sword, then there would be a very serious problem. But we need to start with that, as a base, and then expand upon it. As it is, the fact that they are equal is damning evidence, but the greater maximum damage of TWF makes a possibility.. Until you start looking at a greatsword, as I did further on. That's true, but you're skipping ahead. I was first comparing a TWF fighter, to a fighter with a Great Sword, without Power Attack. Each is a feat, and it's a fair comparison to compare them, as you suggest. In fact, I did exactly that later on.. But in testing, you want to examine one variable at a time. So I was, trying at least, to test TWF against the Great Sword, before introducing the Power Attack ont he Great Sword. That's true, but I was adding that to be able to later on discuss the posibility of modifying the Great Sword Crit range, to attempt to fix the problem. It came out even for Average Damage, and a greater maximum. That is for comparing One Longsword WITHOUT powerattack to Two Long Swords, with TWF. That being said, if you give the Long Sword Power Attack under the 3.5 rules, it does come out ahead. 5.75 damage with Power Attack with a Long Sword, and only 5.25 with TWF. Thanks for the help. I'm a bit frustrated that I don't seem to understand WoTC motivations.. They aren't setting rules to make things balance out right (which simple math shows), and they aren't setting them to be ultra-realistic.. So I'm a bit at a loss as to how they derived their numbers.. Colin [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Trying to make dual-wielding a bit better
Top