Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Impeesa" data-source="post: 1251055" data-attributes="member: 498">Yeah, that occurred to me... the way they said it though, also seemed to imply that they may not even be able to get what I wanted at all. Plus I was getting tired of going back and forth at that point, and it (ideally) still has to be here by Christmas. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Edit: Ranting is therapeutic, sent off another message without feeling the need to sarcastically question their deductive abilities. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> On the down side, my suspicions were correct - got a reply back, a one-of-a-kind custom set would be unfeasible for anything less than a ridiculous amount. It's the economies of scale that I was forgetting to account for - I really should know better, too.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f631.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":o" title="Eek!&nbsp; &nbsp; :o"&nbsp; data-smilie="9"data-shortname=":o" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Impeesa, post: 1251055, member: 498"] Yeah, that occurred to me... the way they said it though, also seemed to imply that they may not even be able to get what I wanted at all. Plus I was getting tired of going back and forth at that point, and it (ideally) still has to be here by Christmas. ;) Edit: Ranting is therapeutic, sent off another message without feeling the need to sarcastically question their deductive abilities. :) On the down side, my suspicions were correct - got a reply back, a one-of-a-kind custom set would be unfeasible for anything less than a ridiculous amount. It's the economies of scale that I was forgetting to account for - I really should know better, too. :o [/QUOTE]

Verification