Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Tuesday May 29 Happy Fun Hour with Mike Mearls - more psionics!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 7430919" data-attributes="member: 12731"><p>Not when using the app, it aint <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Besides, the way multiquotes don't toggle off automatically after being used (meaning every other quote brings them in, at least for that browsing session) generally means they're much too bothersome even when I do access the site using my computer (as I do now).</p><p></p><p></p><p>I actually prefer if the three archetypes does not share the same base class, if they can pull off the uniqueness without doing that. </p><p></p><p>In other words. A Psion class (mystic or whatever) with a decent selection of subclasses is the core; fulfilling "telepath" "oracle" and other psionic non-combaty concepts.</p><p></p><p>Then a subclass of fighter. It gets the bare essential martial abilities, which mostly means the gear profiencies and the second and third attacks. Everything else is switched out for Psychic Warrior goodness. (if previous editions are anything to go by, this will quickly get very powerful).</p><p></p><p>Finally a subclass of rogue. Offering up a "psychic hexblade" concept married to "shadow psi monk".</p><p></p><p>So one new class with at least three subclasses. Preferably less power in the base class (than wizard) allowing more differentation in the subclasses (all schools of wizardry, with the possible exception of bladesingers, are very similar). Since psionics should not just be spells refluffed (and hopefully not even spell points relabeled power points), and because of the greater differentiation between subclasses, this needs to be its own class.</p><p></p><p>And then at least two more subclasses, piggybacking on PHB classes (most easily fighter and rogue). Here I can agree the concepts don't support enough variety for unique classes, and so subclasses of existing classes it is.</p><p></p><p>Smushing together everything in just one single class, however, would be a mistake. Just like Fighter and Wizard should never be melded.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 7430919, member: 12731"] Not when using the app, it aint :) Besides, the way multiquotes don't toggle off automatically after being used (meaning every other quote brings them in, at least for that browsing session) generally means they're much too bothersome even when I do access the site using my computer (as I do now). I actually prefer if the three archetypes does not share the same base class, if they can pull off the uniqueness without doing that. In other words. A Psion class (mystic or whatever) with a decent selection of subclasses is the core; fulfilling "telepath" "oracle" and other psionic non-combaty concepts. Then a subclass of fighter. It gets the bare essential martial abilities, which mostly means the gear profiencies and the second and third attacks. Everything else is switched out for Psychic Warrior goodness. (if previous editions are anything to go by, this will quickly get very powerful). Finally a subclass of rogue. Offering up a "psychic hexblade" concept married to "shadow psi monk". So one new class with at least three subclasses. Preferably less power in the base class (than wizard) allowing more differentation in the subclasses (all schools of wizardry, with the possible exception of bladesingers, are very similar). Since psionics should not just be spells refluffed (and hopefully not even spell points relabeled power points), and because of the greater differentiation between subclasses, this needs to be its own class. And then at least two more subclasses, piggybacking on PHB classes (most easily fighter and rogue). Here I can agree the concepts don't support enough variety for unique classes, and so subclasses of existing classes it is. Smushing together everything in just one single class, however, would be a mistake. Just like Fighter and Wizard should never be melded. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Tuesday May 29 Happy Fun Hour with Mike Mearls - more psionics!
Top