Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Tumble too powerful?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kchaka" data-source="post: 6267308" data-attributes="member: 6775010"><p>True. We have set the bar pretty high. We wanna keep it hard to avoid the AoO, but not so hard as CMD as DC vs a skill check. (CMD is Touch AC +BAB +STR +Size mod)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Only to AoO while tumbling.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>15 + BAB is a very good rule. It's sound and simple. We could use this rule, but we wanna adjust the numbers on this other one to make it work, we think it will make the results more umpredictable with all the different Attack & AC modifiers that can come up during combat.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yep, I made a mistake whe I said it would always be worth tumbling, there will be times when the risk of getting hit will be too high and it will probably be better not to tumble.</p><p></p><p>I think we understand each other, you want to have situations where you'll have 0% chance of failure in tumble, and I want to make sure AoO will not be easily avoided, but I also wanna be able to benefit from tumble at some level, even when the odds aren't great. Both systems are good options to replace the basic 3.5 DC15 and the Pathfinder CMD DC, but ours still needs some tweaking to get where we want.</p><p></p><p>It's also good to notice that, in this system, the enemy spends his AoO, even if the tumble is successfull, but at least he got to take a swing at you.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>BTW, this question came up in another forum that got me thinking:</p><p></p><p>Q: If you tumble to avoid AoO, does the enemy spends his AoO?</p><p>A: No</p><p></p><p>This makes no sense. Picture this, a Rogue decides to tumble through a Large Ogre threatened area.</p><p></p><p>The Rogue moves up to the start of the Ogre's threatened area and start to roll or whatever at half speed (for some reason, moving at half speed makes you harder to hit).</p><p></p><p>The Ogre sees the Rogue rolling by him and thinks: "Damn, he's rolling, I can't take a swing at him!"</p><p></p><p>If the Rogue succeeds the check, has to move through all threatened squares at half speed.</p><p></p><p><strong>This is how it should be:</strong></p><p></p><p>The Rogue moves up to the start of the Ogre's threatened area and says "Yo! DM, I'm gonna tumble past the Ogre, do you wanna take a swing at me?" and he shows how he wants to move, but doesn't roll the tumble check yet.</p><p></p><p>The Ogre sees the Rogue rolling by him and thinks: "Damn, he's rolling, I'm not sure if I'm gonna hit that. Maybe I should let him go and wait for that chubby Cleric instead, when he tries to pass."</p><p></p><p>IF the Ogre chooses to not attack the Rogue, he forces him to spend more of his movement by walking the whole way at half speed, and saves his AoO for someone else.</p><p></p><p>If the Ogre does choose to attack the Rogue, he chooses in which square the attack will take place, and then the rogue rolls his tumble.</p><p></p><p>If the tumble succeeds, the Ogre's attack misses and the rogue can just walk the rest of the way, since the Ogre won't be able to attack him again for the same movement, just like anyone else that initialy just tries to pass thorugh the Ogre.</p><p></p><p>If the tumble fails, the Ogre's attack may hit the Rogue or not. Either way the Rogue can now move the rest of the way normaly, if he didn't die or got knocked prone.</p><p></p><p>In the end, the Ogre can choose to take a swing at the tumbler or not, but he won't know if the tumble was successfull or not until after he chooses.</p><p></p><p>This makes more sense, except for the part where moving at half speed makes you harder to hit, that part still doesn't.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kchaka, post: 6267308, member: 6775010"] True. We have set the bar pretty high. We wanna keep it hard to avoid the AoO, but not so hard as CMD as DC vs a skill check. (CMD is Touch AC +BAB +STR +Size mod) Only to AoO while tumbling. 15 + BAB is a very good rule. It's sound and simple. We could use this rule, but we wanna adjust the numbers on this other one to make it work, we think it will make the results more umpredictable with all the different Attack & AC modifiers that can come up during combat. Yep, I made a mistake whe I said it would always be worth tumbling, there will be times when the risk of getting hit will be too high and it will probably be better not to tumble. I think we understand each other, you want to have situations where you'll have 0% chance of failure in tumble, and I want to make sure AoO will not be easily avoided, but I also wanna be able to benefit from tumble at some level, even when the odds aren't great. Both systems are good options to replace the basic 3.5 DC15 and the Pathfinder CMD DC, but ours still needs some tweaking to get where we want. It's also good to notice that, in this system, the enemy spends his AoO, even if the tumble is successfull, but at least he got to take a swing at you. BTW, this question came up in another forum that got me thinking: Q: If you tumble to avoid AoO, does the enemy spends his AoO? A: No This makes no sense. Picture this, a Rogue decides to tumble through a Large Ogre threatened area. The Rogue moves up to the start of the Ogre's threatened area and start to roll or whatever at half speed (for some reason, moving at half speed makes you harder to hit). The Ogre sees the Rogue rolling by him and thinks: "Damn, he's rolling, I can't take a swing at him!" If the Rogue succeeds the check, has to move through all threatened squares at half speed. [B]This is how it should be:[/B] The Rogue moves up to the start of the Ogre's threatened area and says "Yo! DM, I'm gonna tumble past the Ogre, do you wanna take a swing at me?" and he shows how he wants to move, but doesn't roll the tumble check yet. The Ogre sees the Rogue rolling by him and thinks: "Damn, he's rolling, I'm not sure if I'm gonna hit that. Maybe I should let him go and wait for that chubby Cleric instead, when he tries to pass." IF the Ogre chooses to not attack the Rogue, he forces him to spend more of his movement by walking the whole way at half speed, and saves his AoO for someone else. If the Ogre does choose to attack the Rogue, he chooses in which square the attack will take place, and then the rogue rolls his tumble. If the tumble succeeds, the Ogre's attack misses and the rogue can just walk the rest of the way, since the Ogre won't be able to attack him again for the same movement, just like anyone else that initialy just tries to pass thorugh the Ogre. If the tumble fails, the Ogre's attack may hit the Rogue or not. Either way the Rogue can now move the rest of the way normaly, if he didn't die or got knocked prone. In the end, the Ogre can choose to take a swing at the tumbler or not, but he won't know if the tumble was successfull or not until after he chooses. This makes more sense, except for the part where moving at half speed makes you harder to hit, that part still doesn't. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Tumble too powerful?
Top