Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Tumbling around Corners
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Christian" data-source="post: 272049" data-attributes="member: 381"><p>I think I've posted to one of your threads on hexes before, KD. I think you're right, but I doubt we'll ever sway the bulk of the gaming community. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /> </p><p></p><p>I still disagree with your last two paragraphs, though. It's not at all clear to me-in fact, I can't find anwhere in the rules that say that the diagonal (or even the orthoganal) five-foot move is always available. That's because whether the move can be made depends on exactly what obstacles exist; and whether a given set of obstacles prevents a given move is *entirely* a DM call.</p><p></p><p>I wouldn't call my rule a house rule, even. It's a rule of thumb that I use to help adjudicate this type of situation, which is (rightly) not covered in the official ruleset.</p><p></p><p>The rules can't and shouldn't tell anyone when there is or isn't enough room to squeeze by someone. It depends on <em>exactly</em> how big the someone is, on <em>exactly</em> how wide the hallway/opening is, <em>exactly</em> where they're standing, etc. And you can't perfectly represent this with 5' squares, 5' hexes, or anything else. (OK, maybe 1/2" hexes would work ...) It is necessarily a DM call whether a figure can move past or must move through another figure or obstacle; and IMO, the rule I suggested is a good 'default'.</p><p></p><p>In this situation, the DM's call in the initial situation is good <em>by definition</em>. He decided that the particular location of the enemy in that 5' square was such that he fully blocked the doorway. (It's possible to fully block a doorway from movement in either direction, isn't it?) The only thing I would say is that the DM should make that clear to the player and allow him to alter his character's action accordingly, if the decision was made in ignorance of a situation that would be clear to the character.</p><p></p><p>The 5' grid (square or hex) is a convenience, not a straitjacket, and I believe that the d20 rules correctly treat it as such ... Here's an analogous problem on a hex grid. If you place a door/opening on a hex line, a 5' opening can be blocked be a single figure on either side. But if the opening happens to fall in the middle of a hex, a figure has to stand all the way in the doorway (a position it can't take in the other situation, actually) to fully block it. Either situation is an artifact of an arbitrary grid. You can't solve all of the problems by switching the grid shape.</p><p></p><p>OK, you can solve most of them, but you get my point, I hope. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Christian, post: 272049, member: 381"] I think I've posted to one of your threads on hexes before, KD. I think you're right, but I doubt we'll ever sway the bulk of the gaming community. :( I still disagree with your last two paragraphs, though. It's not at all clear to me-in fact, I can't find anwhere in the rules that say that the diagonal (or even the orthoganal) five-foot move is always available. That's because whether the move can be made depends on exactly what obstacles exist; and whether a given set of obstacles prevents a given move is *entirely* a DM call. I wouldn't call my rule a house rule, even. It's a rule of thumb that I use to help adjudicate this type of situation, which is (rightly) not covered in the official ruleset. The rules can't and shouldn't tell anyone when there is or isn't enough room to squeeze by someone. It depends on [i]exactly[/i] how big the someone is, on [i]exactly[/i] how wide the hallway/opening is, [i]exactly[/i] where they're standing, etc. And you can't perfectly represent this with 5' squares, 5' hexes, or anything else. (OK, maybe 1/2" hexes would work ...) It is necessarily a DM call whether a figure can move past or must move through another figure or obstacle; and IMO, the rule I suggested is a good 'default'. In this situation, the DM's call in the initial situation is good [i]by definition[/i]. He decided that the particular location of the enemy in that 5' square was such that he fully blocked the doorway. (It's possible to fully block a doorway from movement in either direction, isn't it?) The only thing I would say is that the DM should make that clear to the player and allow him to alter his character's action accordingly, if the decision was made in ignorance of a situation that would be clear to the character. The 5' grid (square or hex) is a convenience, not a straitjacket, and I believe that the d20 rules correctly treat it as such ... Here's an analogous problem on a hex grid. If you place a door/opening on a hex line, a 5' opening can be blocked be a single figure on either side. But if the opening happens to fall in the middle of a hex, a figure has to stand all the way in the doorway (a position it can't take in the other situation, actually) to fully block it. Either situation is an artifact of an arbitrary grid. You can't solve all of the problems by switching the grid shape. OK, you can solve most of them, but you get my point, I hope. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Tumbling around Corners
Top