Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Rongar" data-source="post: 6121020" data-attributes="member: 6695483">I'm new to this site, and I've a question about our 3.5 game. We have a  guy who wants to build a Rogue using Two Weapon Fighting (PH), along  with taking Exotic Weapon Proficiency (PH) in Eagle Claw (Sandstorm). He  then wants to take the Feat Eagle's Fury (Sandstorm). Level aside here, and just using what I've listed, can he use a Eagle  Claw in each hand (TWF) and use the Eagle's Fury Feat? Both TWF and  Eagle's Fury require Full Round Actions to use. TWF gives a -2/-2  penalty if he uses two Eagle Claws since it's a light weapon. The  Eagle's Fury Feat also gives a -2 penalty to attack, but that's because  you get an extra attack when using an Eagle's Claw. So each hand attacks  twice per round and gets the penalty.So a Rogue with the above Feats and using a Eagle Claw in each hand  would get 4 attacks per round with each of those attacks at a -4/hit  each (I'm not adding BAB, Str, or anything else because it's irrelevant  to my question)? Or would that Rogue not be able to stack the Eagle's  Fury Feat with the TWF Feat since they both state that you need to use  the Full Attack action? I personally think it's do-able, but want some  serious opinions and/or proof of why this cannot work. Thanx for your  time everyone. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />(Oh, and plz don't compare this to Rapid Shot because RS is used with a Bow (2-handed weapon) for the most part. I know it can be used with thrown weapons, but that's not happening with this  build since the Eagle's Claw doesn't have a range increment and would incur a non-proficiency penalty. So Rapid Shot isn't really comparable for this question and I don't want to go into a whole new discussion.)</blockquote>

Verification