Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
twf + flurry -- all unarmed?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thia Halmades" data-source="post: 2690204" data-attributes="member: 35863"><p>Going through the gymnastics myself, I can see the argument that after a FoB, similiarly to, say, a normal full attack using iteritive attacks, you'd make a follow-up attack with your off-hand weapon. *shrug* Okay. They're already engaged in a FAA, so I see no balance issue.</p><p></p><p>Magic Weapon: I would argue that one fist, or the 'primary attack' if that's an issue (one primary attacking foot, etc.) would have the modifier applied. You could ALSO use the +1 everywhere version and save yourself the headache, but the single-pop version would apply so long as everyone was clear where the enhancement was placed.</p><p></p><p>I'm still on the "you can attack with an off-hand" bandwagon; if the point of the monk is to in any way recreate chop-saki martial arts action, then it doesn't make sense (logically) to disallow their use of TWF in the event that they took it. The reason I say it must be allowed is because:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So that says to me that, in fact, the penalty for STR is never assessed and the whole thing is just worded messily, but this (to me) clearly indicates that a Monk may take (and use unarmed) TWF.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thia Halmades, post: 2690204, member: 35863"] Going through the gymnastics myself, I can see the argument that after a FoB, similiarly to, say, a normal full attack using iteritive attacks, you'd make a follow-up attack with your off-hand weapon. *shrug* Okay. They're already engaged in a FAA, so I see no balance issue. Magic Weapon: I would argue that one fist, or the 'primary attack' if that's an issue (one primary attacking foot, etc.) would have the modifier applied. You could ALSO use the +1 everywhere version and save yourself the headache, but the single-pop version would apply so long as everyone was clear where the enhancement was placed. I'm still on the "you can attack with an off-hand" bandwagon; if the point of the monk is to in any way recreate chop-saki martial arts action, then it doesn't make sense (logically) to disallow their use of TWF in the event that they took it. The reason I say it must be allowed is because: So that says to me that, in fact, the penalty for STR is never assessed and the whole thing is just worded messily, but this (to me) clearly indicates that a Monk may take (and use unarmed) TWF. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
twf + flurry -- all unarmed?
Top