Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Treebore" data-source="post: 4772720" data-attributes="member: 10177"><img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing    :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" />Yeah, I watched one of those "What if a big meteor hits the Earth" programs within the last month or so and I considered setting my T:2013 game on such a scenario. Its not how our civilization gets destroyed for this game, its what we do with our characters after the world as we know it is in ruins. So I might go in such a direction.As it is I am going to pretty much go with the T:2013 scenario, however I am going to use far fewer nukes and have a lot more germ warfare weapons used. I want my campaign based around controlling what resources are left so I want most of my cities destroyed by natural fires not nuclear blasts. I am going to stick with mainland China being totally nuked, though. Then I am going to have Bio weapons of mass destruction employed to stop the Chinese armies in other areas in their tracks. Except on the peninsula. I'll still use bio weapons there too, but much less lethal strains, but far more debilitating.I still have plenty of time to think about it, so we'll see.</blockquote>