Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Twin Strike Target Declaration Question?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fba827" data-source="post: 4361958" data-attributes="member: 807"><p>Unless/Until there is some sort of official statement on it, it probably is best for your DM to decide.</p><p></p><p>But, having said that, I read it as "declare your targets (one or two), then roll, then apply damage"</p><p></p><p>Playing as a Ranger with twin-strike, I also find that this way keeps things moving at the table since I can roll both dice at once rather than an extra pause to consider options between rolls when it really all should be one fluid motion to use one power. </p><p></p><p>If it was anything like a "secondary attack" line entry on the power, then I'd say you could choose after seeing if the first hits, but since both attacks are listed on the the same target line, I read it as one motion to fire two arrows at once, and the second arrow won't know what the first arrow is doing ... so you declare both arrow targets at the time of using the power.</p><p></p><p>Again, that's all just my take on it. As said up top -- it's up to your DM.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Edit: Or follow the RAW as referenced by Mort_Q <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fba827, post: 4361958, member: 807"] Unless/Until there is some sort of official statement on it, it probably is best for your DM to decide. But, having said that, I read it as "declare your targets (one or two), then roll, then apply damage" Playing as a Ranger with twin-strike, I also find that this way keeps things moving at the table since I can roll both dice at once rather than an extra pause to consider options between rolls when it really all should be one fluid motion to use one power. If it was anything like a "secondary attack" line entry on the power, then I'd say you could choose after seeing if the first hits, but since both attacks are listed on the the same target line, I read it as one motion to fire two arrows at once, and the second arrow won't know what the first arrow is doing ... so you declare both arrow targets at the time of using the power. Again, that's all just my take on it. As said up top -- it's up to your DM. Edit: Or follow the RAW as referenced by Mort_Q :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Twin Strike Target Declaration Question?
Top