Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="kreynolds" data-source="post: 283502" data-attributes="member: 2829">Two reasons, though Morose was pretty close, though he was kinda morose about it. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> <badoom-boom>1) As a Tempest, a prestige class that is nothing special in it's own right, as it's pretty unimaginative (I use a 5 level version in my campaigns), you can get 4 attacks with your off-hand easily, and before you hit epic level, no less. So there's absolutely nothing so special about a 4th attack with your off-hand that justifies it being an epic feat.2) Now, I don't know where I stand on the whole "All feats should be equal thing", but as a feat, there's just no logical reason, nor play-balance reason, that I can see that justifies it being an epic feat. In the grand ol' scheme o' things, it just doesn't destroy the game or upset it if it were a regular feat. I should know. I've had a non-epic version of it in all of my games ever since my greedy little eyes saw the Improved Two-Weapon Fighting feat.</blockquote>