Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mind of tempest" data-source="post: 8296245" data-attributes="member: 7029233">personally, I am less kill the scared and more move the specific to a subclass as most people will just get slightly annoyed at a name change and not really do anything as long as they can play what they like.I still have no idea what the bard was ever supposed to represent as magic troubadour seems nut even by my zany set of standards.I have seen one guys monk homebrew thing call a cultivator on reddit if that would be more to your taste, honestly, I just want monk to work properly first as 4e and 5e are probably the only editions where it did not suck and I just love the little guy.have got two ideas for subclasses to branch the monk out from its east Asian defaults if you wish to hear thempaladin is an odd beast as I know of few explicitly bless by gods characters who gain fantastic abilities so to me, I see less of a problem as I do not know of anything it is overshadowing plus it is less likely to anger like templar would.have the anthropologist got a less offensive but still snappy word as an alternative yet?I flat out want to melt barbarian down into a rage fighter subclass as at present it makes not a lick of sense to call it that or have it as a full class.</blockquote>