Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Two New Settings For D&D This Year
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lkj" data-source="post: 7752485" data-attributes="member: 18646"><p>There's a lot here. And I understand your thoughts on the matter. I don't agree with a lot of it, but I think we'll probably just have to go with the 'agree to disagree' route (which I usually do with forum disagreements, as I lack the energy for lengthy ones and usually it comes down to differing tastes). But to avoid being cryptic, I'll note my own opinions:</p><p></p><p>1) I don't think the D&D system 'isn't that great' or that class and level based systems suck. I can see that they might not suit certain tastes, however. And that's fine. </p><p></p><p>2) I don't agree that having the Realms as the only supported setting would make D&D a setting specific game and eventually result in people abandoning it. From previous survey info WotC has released, most games are homebrew. And within the main books (especially DMG) they provide a great deal of support of homebrew. And I've found their Realms products to be great and easily adaptable resources for my own homebrew games. I haven't run a realms game in decades, but I've lifted a lot material from their adventures in 5e. And I think they are designed that way intentionally. Do I think providing other settings as examples would be useful for folks? Yes! Do I really want them to release other settings for me to plunder? Absolutely! Do I think it's an imperative for the long term viability of the game? Probably not. </p><p></p><p>All that said, they have been clearly telegraphing other settings for awhile. I don't think it will be a quick bone thrown to us grognard dogs. We may or may not like their approach (I guarantee some of us will hate it). But I think it will be a well thought out plan. I also think it'll be wrapped around storylines. </p><p></p><p>I think you have a great point about DDB and the likelihood that print at some point may not be the primary mode of consumption. </p><p></p><p>And I have all these random thoughts about how they might use 'primers', the DM's Guild, print adventures, their multiverse approach in these upcoming plans . . . but I'm tired. And my ability to predict with any specificity what they tend to do has been pretty piss poor anyway. So I think I'll go to bed instead. </p><p></p><p>Cheers,</p><p>AD</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lkj, post: 7752485, member: 18646"] There's a lot here. And I understand your thoughts on the matter. I don't agree with a lot of it, but I think we'll probably just have to go with the 'agree to disagree' route (which I usually do with forum disagreements, as I lack the energy for lengthy ones and usually it comes down to differing tastes). But to avoid being cryptic, I'll note my own opinions: 1) I don't think the D&D system 'isn't that great' or that class and level based systems suck. I can see that they might not suit certain tastes, however. And that's fine. 2) I don't agree that having the Realms as the only supported setting would make D&D a setting specific game and eventually result in people abandoning it. From previous survey info WotC has released, most games are homebrew. And within the main books (especially DMG) they provide a great deal of support of homebrew. And I've found their Realms products to be great and easily adaptable resources for my own homebrew games. I haven't run a realms game in decades, but I've lifted a lot material from their adventures in 5e. And I think they are designed that way intentionally. Do I think providing other settings as examples would be useful for folks? Yes! Do I really want them to release other settings for me to plunder? Absolutely! Do I think it's an imperative for the long term viability of the game? Probably not. All that said, they have been clearly telegraphing other settings for awhile. I don't think it will be a quick bone thrown to us grognard dogs. We may or may not like their approach (I guarantee some of us will hate it). But I think it will be a well thought out plan. I also think it'll be wrapped around storylines. I think you have a great point about DDB and the likelihood that print at some point may not be the primary mode of consumption. And I have all these random thoughts about how they might use 'primers', the DM's Guild, print adventures, their multiverse approach in these upcoming plans . . . but I'm tired. And my ability to predict with any specificity what they tend to do has been pretty piss poor anyway. So I think I'll go to bed instead. Cheers, AD [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Two New Settings For D&D This Year
Top