Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Two underlying truths: D&D heritage and inclusivity
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mercurius" data-source="post: 8022869" data-attributes="member: 59082"><p>This is going too far, Hussar (and I think overly conflates this issue with real world race issues, and perpetuates the notion that those not on the same page with the "linkage interpretation" are inherently gatekeeping, rather than just coming from a different interpretative framework).</p><p></p><p>Leaving racism aside, if the problem is exclusion in the D&D community, then one isn't necessarily "part of the problem" if they disagree about this interpretative link. This would imply that for those non-white people who don't see the linkage, or don't think it is a problem, that they're also part of the problem. It also implies that there is a Right Way of seeing this issue, all others are shades of wrong. That's called fundamentalism.</p><p></p><p>That said, if you are saying that telling them that the linkage isn't there is part of the problem, I think there is truth to that. Or at least, if we tweak your wording to be more like "telling them that what they feel is wrong." If they feel the way they feel, there is a problem that should be addressed (although <em>how</em> is a matter of debate...obviously). Just because I personally don't think that the depiction of orcs perpetuates racism, doesn't mean that I don't think changes are warranted. The problem is real for some people, so needs to be addressed in some way, and to some degree. Real people feel excluded, so that needs to be addressed. Emphasis on "in some way."</p><p></p><p>But telling the Linkage People that you don't see the linkage, no, that doesn't automatically make one part of the problem (of exclusion). Unless, of course, I'm running around in gatherings of Linkage People and shouting, "you're all wrong!" One can say, "I don't agree with your interpretation for these reasons, but I don't think you or anyone should feel excluded, so let's find a way to change that."</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, pummeling the Non-Linkage People--or anyone who isn't lock-step with Linkagism--again and again, with accusations of exclusion or, worse, racism, doesn't help. At all. And it doesn't facilitate real understanding between the two camps, and also ignores that there aren't really just two camps, but a wide range of perspectives.</p><p></p><p>This is a discussion board, and the topic at hand is how to come up with creative solutions. The linkage (Linkagegate?!) is impossible to separate from discussion unless we all agree on that linkage. Obviously we don't, and there probably won't ever be full agreement. But what we <em>can </em>do is come up with solutions. We can all agree that there is a problem (because for some, there is a problem), and we can all agree (I think/hope) that everyone who wants to play D&D should feel like they're part of the community.</p><p></p><p>As an aside, I would guess that seeing the linkage is more ideological than it is based on one's ethnicity. It is an interpretation of data based upon a certain ideological framework. It most certainly is <em>not</em> POC/inclusionists/allies vs. whites/exclusionists/racists, and let's not make it that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mercurius, post: 8022869, member: 59082"] This is going too far, Hussar (and I think overly conflates this issue with real world race issues, and perpetuates the notion that those not on the same page with the "linkage interpretation" are inherently gatekeeping, rather than just coming from a different interpretative framework). Leaving racism aside, if the problem is exclusion in the D&D community, then one isn't necessarily "part of the problem" if they disagree about this interpretative link. This would imply that for those non-white people who don't see the linkage, or don't think it is a problem, that they're also part of the problem. It also implies that there is a Right Way of seeing this issue, all others are shades of wrong. That's called fundamentalism. That said, if you are saying that telling them that the linkage isn't there is part of the problem, I think there is truth to that. Or at least, if we tweak your wording to be more like "telling them that what they feel is wrong." If they feel the way they feel, there is a problem that should be addressed (although [I]how[/I] is a matter of debate...obviously). Just because I personally don't think that the depiction of orcs perpetuates racism, doesn't mean that I don't think changes are warranted. The problem is real for some people, so needs to be addressed in some way, and to some degree. Real people feel excluded, so that needs to be addressed. Emphasis on "in some way." But telling the Linkage People that you don't see the linkage, no, that doesn't automatically make one part of the problem (of exclusion). Unless, of course, I'm running around in gatherings of Linkage People and shouting, "you're all wrong!" One can say, "I don't agree with your interpretation for these reasons, but I don't think you or anyone should feel excluded, so let's find a way to change that." On the other hand, pummeling the Non-Linkage People--or anyone who isn't lock-step with Linkagism--again and again, with accusations of exclusion or, worse, racism, doesn't help. At all. And it doesn't facilitate real understanding between the two camps, and also ignores that there aren't really just two camps, but a wide range of perspectives. This is a discussion board, and the topic at hand is how to come up with creative solutions. The linkage (Linkagegate?!) is impossible to separate from discussion unless we all agree on that linkage. Obviously we don't, and there probably won't ever be full agreement. But what we [I]can [/I]do is come up with solutions. We can all agree that there is a problem (because for some, there is a problem), and we can all agree (I think/hope) that everyone who wants to play D&D should feel like they're part of the community. As an aside, I would guess that seeing the linkage is more ideological than it is based on one's ethnicity. It is an interpretation of data based upon a certain ideological framework. It most certainly is [I]not[/I] POC/inclusionists/allies vs. whites/exclusionists/racists, and let's not make it that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Two underlying truths: D&D heritage and inclusivity
Top