Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Two-Volume Settings and the Legacy of Editions Past
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ahnirades" data-source="post: 4841450" data-attributes="member: 45759"><p>As most of us are no doubt aware, Wizard’s current setting publication model comprises of a player’s guide, a DM’s reference and a single adventure, repeated annually. It’s a straightforward approach, intended to offer breadth of choice without requiring the enormous buy in that the decades-old monoliths of previous editions insisted on.</p><p> </p><p>Yet as I flicked through the Player’s Guide to Eberron I found myself asking the kind of basic, nuts and bolts questions that any self-respecting introductory book should answer. What does the lightning rail actually look like? Or an elemental carriage? What are the limits of magical technology and how does its use impact on daily life? Beyond that were a host of more detailed queries unlikely to be answered under the two volume format. </p><p> </p><p>My solution was to go online, where I eventually ended up ordering a pile of 3.x books. Doing so led to the realisation that a detail orientated GM like myself is virtually required to adopt the literature of an earlier edition if he wants to properly explore a world published under the current one. As someone who had very little interest in 3.x the sense of irony I felt regarding my situation was pronounced. </p><p> </p><p>Now, whilst I have no doubt that the Eberron Campaign Guide will be as comprehensive a book as it can be, the lack of further planned support means it will be a broad-brush treatment only. Great for some, not so good for others. Ideally I’d like to see supplemental material appearing via the DDI, perhaps as a series of lengthy articles featuring modular, downloadable content that complements and expands upon the published material. The one-setting-per-year embargo could still be enforced, with the next annual release heralding the end of Setting <em>X</em>'s run as it makes way for Setting <em>Y</em>'s monthly support. </p><p> </p><p>In short, I’d like to see Wizards adopt a model that accomodates the subset of their userbase whom desire a fuller realisation of their worlds.</p><p style="text-align: right"><img src="http://forum.rpg.net/images/misc/progress.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ahnirades, post: 4841450, member: 45759"] As most of us are no doubt aware, Wizard’s current setting publication model comprises of a player’s guide, a DM’s reference and a single adventure, repeated annually. It’s a straightforward approach, intended to offer breadth of choice without requiring the enormous buy in that the decades-old monoliths of previous editions insisted on. Yet as I flicked through the Player’s Guide to Eberron I found myself asking the kind of basic, nuts and bolts questions that any self-respecting introductory book should answer. What does the lightning rail actually look like? Or an elemental carriage? What are the limits of magical technology and how does its use impact on daily life? Beyond that were a host of more detailed queries unlikely to be answered under the two volume format. My solution was to go online, where I eventually ended up ordering a pile of 3.x books. Doing so led to the realisation that a detail orientated GM like myself is virtually required to adopt the literature of an earlier edition if he wants to properly explore a world published under the current one. As someone who had very little interest in 3.x the sense of irony I felt regarding my situation was pronounced. Now, whilst I have no doubt that the Eberron Campaign Guide will be as comprehensive a book as it can be, the lack of further planned support means it will be a broad-brush treatment only. Great for some, not so good for others. Ideally I’d like to see supplemental material appearing via the DDI, perhaps as a series of lengthy articles featuring modular, downloadable content that complements and expands upon the published material. The one-setting-per-year embargo could still be enforced, with the next annual release heralding the end of Setting [I]X[/I]'s run as it makes way for Setting [I]Y[/I]'s monthly support. In short, I’d like to see Wizards adopt a model that accomodates the subset of their userbase whom desire a fuller realisation of their worlds. [RIGHT][IMG]http://forum.rpg.net/images/misc/progress.gif[/IMG][/RIGHT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Two-Volume Settings and the Legacy of Editions Past
Top