Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Roland Delacroix" data-source="post: 769388" data-attributes="member: 1753">Heh, your example is so flawed it funny <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D"&nbsp; data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />&nbsp; First you assume that the TW guy hits both times, at his lower BAB.&nbsp; You also assume that they have a 14 Str?&nbsp; As a primary fighter?&nbsp; I've never seen that unless its a ranger who needs Dex because of crappy AC.&nbsp; Also at low levels can be marginaly better for low STR fighters because they have 2 rolls to get the 19-20 they need to hit.&nbsp; I'll take the 18 STR fighter with Cleave any day though.Thanks for the link Hawkshere, lost mine.&nbsp; Also suggest you search here or at the WotC min/max boards for a good dozen analysis's of TWF.&nbsp; Oh, and I commend your player for choosing a very cool RP fighting style over dealing more damage.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Roland Delacroix, post: 769388, member: 1753"] Heh, your example is so flawed it funny :D First you assume that the TW guy hits both times, at his lower BAB. You also assume that they have a 14 Str? As a primary fighter? I've never seen that unless its a ranger who needs Dex because of crappy AC. Also at low levels can be marginaly better for low STR fighters because they have 2 rolls to get the 19-20 they need to hit. I'll take the 18 STR fighter with Cleave any day though. Thanks for the link Hawkshere, lost mine. Also suggest you search here or at the WotC min/max boards for a good dozen analysis's of TWF. Oh, and I commend your player for choosing a very cool RP fighting style over dealing more damage. [/QUOTE]

Verification