Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ECMO3" data-source="post: 9445392" data-attributes="member: 7030563">I think the feats are a general ability and think more players will have one of them then will have magic secrets, and you are right it is up to one spell each on ST and FT. My only point is they did not really do what they claimed.&nbsp; IMO this was probably an oversight and the intent was to do what Crawford claimed, but then they forgot to look at those abilities/feats. I don't think they spent a lot of time editing and proofing some of the changes (maybe because they fired a lot of the staff?).&nbsp; I think if they had paid more attention to detail, at a minimum they would have reworded FT/ST and probably would have changed the subclasses too.&nbsp; I think they also overlooked this specifically when they changed Wrathful Smite to a necromancy spell.I really like what I have seen of the new rules and I am excited to try out a few builds.&nbsp; But they appear to be rather sloppy and haphazardly put together and I think this is one example of it - it is important to protect these iconic thematic spells, and then we let other classes access them in numerous ways.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ECMO3, post: 9445392, member: 7030563"] I think the feats are a general ability and think more players will have one of them then will have magic secrets, and you are right it is up to one spell each on ST and FT. My only point is they did not really do what they claimed. IMO this was probably an oversight and the intent was to do what Crawford claimed, but then they forgot to look at those abilities/feats. I don't think they spent a lot of time editing and proofing some of the changes (maybe because they fired a lot of the staff?). I think if they had paid more attention to detail, at a minimum they would have reworded FT/ST and probably would have changed the subclasses too. I think they also overlooked this specifically when they changed Wrathful Smite to a necromancy spell. I really like what I have seen of the new rules and I am excited to try out a few builds. But they appear to be rather sloppy and haphazardly put together and I think this is one example of it - [I]it is important to protect these iconic thematic spells, [/I]and then we let other classes access them in numerous ways. [/QUOTE]

Verification