Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Typo or deliberate?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrMyth" data-source="post: 5731524" data-attributes="member: 61155"><p>In this case, it is exactly that. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> What you are sustaining is simply the ability to <em>keep </em>sustaining it, and, thus, gain free attacks. </p><p> </p><p>You have hit the problem with the power design - it doesn't actually list an effect to be sustained, which is typically what sustaining is for.</p><p> </p><p>The intent of the power is pretty clear, reading the flavor text: </p><p>"<em>Flaring points of star-bright light encircle your head. With each gesture, a painful point of blue-white light leaps away in a halo of choking smoke toward one foe."</em></p><p> </p><p>Clearly what they are aiming for is the idea that, as long as you sustain the power, you retain your 'crown of stars' - and the act of sustaining it is what fires off the lights at your enemies. </p><p> </p><p>As written, it... mostly works. Which is to say, there are 3 or 4 different ways to read it, none of them work perfectly well with the rules, and this interpretation is the one that both fits most smoothly and matches the description of the power. </p><p> </p><p>The alternative interpretations: </p><p> </p><p>1) The sustain effect prolongs the blindness. Except "A power’s description indicates what happens when you sustain it or let it lapse." Extending the blindness is never mentioned in the sustain effect, however. You would be adding a completely new ability to the power, one that is neither referenced within it nor implied by the description of the power. </p><p> </p><p>2) The rules for sustaining refer to sustaining "an effect". The power produces no effect that is referenced in the sustain line, which means you can <em>never </em>take the sustain action. It might match a strict reading of the power, but also is pretty clearly against both the intent and the description of the power. </p><p> </p><p>3) Or, we have the interpretation that cust-serv offered to the DM, which basically involves replacing what the power actually says with, "<strong>Effect</strong>: You acquire a Crown of Stars until the end of your next turn. As a standard action, Make a Charisma vs. Will attack against any target in range. On a hit, deal radiant damage equal to your Charisma modifier. <strong>Sustain Minor</strong>: The Crown of Stars persists until the end of your next turn." Which involves even more significant rewriting of the power and, from a power balance perspective, is pretty clearly a useless ability. </p><p> </p><p>Which leaves us with the interpretation I've been arguing for: That all you are sustaining is the ability to, in effect, keep sustaining the power. That if they properly worded it, it would probably read something like, "<strong>Effect</strong>: You acquire a Crown of Stars until the end of your next turn. <strong>Sustain Minor</strong>: The Crown of Stars persists until the end of your next turn, and Make a Charisma vs. Will attack against any target in range. On a hit, deal radiant damage equal to your Charisma modifier."</p><p> </p><p>That doesn't require any massive adjustments to the power itself, and seems to match the description and intent as well. And is also relatively easy to see why they omitted the additional text, not figuring the need to include an effect that has no actual benefit in and of itself, outside of the Sustain Minor attack.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrMyth, post: 5731524, member: 61155"] In this case, it is exactly that. ;) What you are sustaining is simply the ability to [I]keep [/I]sustaining it, and, thus, gain free attacks. You have hit the problem with the power design - it doesn't actually list an effect to be sustained, which is typically what sustaining is for. The intent of the power is pretty clear, reading the flavor text: "[I]Flaring points of star-bright light encircle your head. With each gesture, a painful point of blue-white light leaps away in a halo of choking smoke toward one foe."[/I] Clearly what they are aiming for is the idea that, as long as you sustain the power, you retain your 'crown of stars' - and the act of sustaining it is what fires off the lights at your enemies. As written, it... mostly works. Which is to say, there are 3 or 4 different ways to read it, none of them work perfectly well with the rules, and this interpretation is the one that both fits most smoothly and matches the description of the power. The alternative interpretations: 1) The sustain effect prolongs the blindness. Except "A power’s description indicates what happens when you sustain it or let it lapse." Extending the blindness is never mentioned in the sustain effect, however. You would be adding a completely new ability to the power, one that is neither referenced within it nor implied by the description of the power. 2) The rules for sustaining refer to sustaining "an effect". The power produces no effect that is referenced in the sustain line, which means you can [I]never [/I]take the sustain action. It might match a strict reading of the power, but also is pretty clearly against both the intent and the description of the power. 3) Or, we have the interpretation that cust-serv offered to the DM, which basically involves replacing what the power actually says with, "[B]Effect[/B]: You acquire a Crown of Stars until the end of your next turn. As a standard action, Make a Charisma vs. Will attack against any target in range. On a hit, deal radiant damage equal to your Charisma modifier. [B]Sustain Minor[/B]: The Crown of Stars persists until the end of your next turn." Which involves even more significant rewriting of the power and, from a power balance perspective, is pretty clearly a useless ability. Which leaves us with the interpretation I've been arguing for: That all you are sustaining is the ability to, in effect, keep sustaining the power. That if they properly worded it, it would probably read something like, "[B]Effect[/B]: You acquire a Crown of Stars until the end of your next turn. [B]Sustain Minor[/B]: The Crown of Stars persists until the end of your next turn, and Make a Charisma vs. Will attack against any target in range. On a hit, deal radiant damage equal to your Charisma modifier." That doesn't require any massive adjustments to the power itself, and seems to match the description and intent as well. And is also relatively easy to see why they omitted the additional text, not figuring the need to include an effect that has no actual benefit in and of itself, outside of the Sustain Minor attack. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Typo or deliberate?
Top