Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Typo or deliberate?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrMyth" data-source="post: 5732327" data-attributes="member: 61155"><p><em>"If a power has a “Sustain” entry, you can keep that power active by taking a specified type of action (minor, move, or standard) during your turn. The “Sustain” entry tells you if a power has an effect that occurs when you take the action to sustain it. See “Durations,” page 278, for more about sustaining a power."</em></p><p> </p><p>Note: No mention of durations of effects in the entry itself - instead, a reference to a <em>seperate </em>section on durations later in the book. Instead, the references are to "keeping the power active". </p><p> </p><p>Again, look up the powers <em>Radiant Pulse</em>, <em>Curse of the Dark Delirium</em>, and <em>Doom of Delban</em>. </p><p> </p><p>All sustainable, all without having the sustain action extend any condition or effect. The exact same thing as <em>Crown of Stars</em>, except that since <em>Crown of Stars</em> has a condition in it, you feel that this should be connected to the sustain action - even though the sustain entry makes no mention of causing the blindness to persist. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>The sustain rules reference "keeping a power active" without requiring it have a specific condition, zone or conjuration that needs to persist. The wording for the sustain rules, on page 59, mentions only sustaining the "power", and makes no reference to conditions, zones or conjurations. </p><p> </p><p>Of the 5 examples given on that page, 3 make mention of the sustain extending the duration of something, while 2 instead reference something that occurs by taking the sustain action. </p><p> </p><p>We have three powers in the PHB that involve sustaining the power without having any condition, zone or conjuration <em>to be sustained</em>. Like those powers, Crown of Stars does not <em>need </em>to reference any "effect" in need of being sustained. All it needs to do is tell us that the <em>power</em> can be sustained (which is does, by virtue of having a "Sustain" entry) and tell us what happens when the power is sustained (the caster makes an attack.)</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>In virtually every single case where a condition, zone or conjuration has its duration extended by Sustaining a power, the Sustain line explicitly states that it is sustained and (usually) for how long. </p><p> </p><p>It is true that the wording is not always consistent on this. But it is pretty close to it, and that is, simultaneously, how the rules tell us it should work - specifying in multiple places that when a power is sustained, you do specifically what it tells you in the sustain line. </p><p> </p><p>Where in the rules do you believe it says that, when a power is sustained, <em>all </em>conditions, zones and conjurations caused by that power automatically have their durations extended? Because if that is interpretation is true, I bet I can track down quite a few powers that will get real weird, real fast, when that rule is applied. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Here is what the rules say: </p><p>-If a power has a Sustain line, it means the power itself can be sustained. No mention is made to conditions, zone or conjurations caused by that power <em>automatically </em>being sustained. Instead, we are told that the Sustain line will tell us what happens when the action is taken to Sustain it. (PHB, pg 59). </p><p>-We are also told some durations are Sustainable. Your interpretation seems to be that <em>any duration </em>involved in a Sustainable power <em>automatically </em>becomes a Sustainable duration. I admit, I can see why you might think that, but I don't think it holds up, either when taking a closer look at the rules, or when examining many of the existing Sustainable powers out there. </p><p>-So, how do we know if a duration is Sustainable? Typically, because the Sustain line itself makes mention of the condition, zone or conjuration that persists due to Sustaining the power. </p><p> </p><p>I can see nothing in the rules that says that a condition caused by a power, but not referenced in its Sustain line, is nonetheless automatically extended when the power is Sustained. </p><p> </p><p>Similarly, I think the rules make it clear (along with the three example powers I gave earlier) that it is entirely possible to have a power which can be sustained without having any condition, zone or conjuration created by the power. Do we at least have agreement on that count?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrMyth, post: 5732327, member: 61155"] [I]"If a power has a “Sustain” entry, you can keep that power active by taking a specified type of action (minor, move, or standard) during your turn. The “Sustain” entry tells you if a power has an effect that occurs when you take the action to sustain it. See “Durations,” page 278, for more about sustaining a power."[/I] Note: No mention of durations of effects in the entry itself - instead, a reference to a [I]seperate [/I]section on durations later in the book. Instead, the references are to "keeping the power active". Again, look up the powers [I]Radiant Pulse[/I], [I]Curse of the Dark Delirium[/I], and [I]Doom of Delban[/I]. All sustainable, all without having the sustain action extend any condition or effect. The exact same thing as [I]Crown of Stars[/I], except that since [I]Crown of Stars[/I] has a condition in it, you feel that this should be connected to the sustain action - even though the sustain entry makes no mention of causing the blindness to persist. The sustain rules reference "keeping a power active" without requiring it have a specific condition, zone or conjuration that needs to persist. The wording for the sustain rules, on page 59, mentions only sustaining the "power", and makes no reference to conditions, zones or conjurations. Of the 5 examples given on that page, 3 make mention of the sustain extending the duration of something, while 2 instead reference something that occurs by taking the sustain action. We have three powers in the PHB that involve sustaining the power without having any condition, zone or conjuration [I]to be sustained[/I]. Like those powers, Crown of Stars does not [I]need [/I]to reference any "effect" in need of being sustained. All it needs to do is tell us that the [I]power[/I] can be sustained (which is does, by virtue of having a "Sustain" entry) and tell us what happens when the power is sustained (the caster makes an attack.) In virtually every single case where a condition, zone or conjuration has its duration extended by Sustaining a power, the Sustain line explicitly states that it is sustained and (usually) for how long. It is true that the wording is not always consistent on this. But it is pretty close to it, and that is, simultaneously, how the rules tell us it should work - specifying in multiple places that when a power is sustained, you do specifically what it tells you in the sustain line. Where in the rules do you believe it says that, when a power is sustained, [I]all [/I]conditions, zones and conjurations caused by that power automatically have their durations extended? Because if that is interpretation is true, I bet I can track down quite a few powers that will get real weird, real fast, when that rule is applied. Here is what the rules say: -If a power has a Sustain line, it means the power itself can be sustained. No mention is made to conditions, zone or conjurations caused by that power [I]automatically [/I]being sustained. Instead, we are told that the Sustain line will tell us what happens when the action is taken to Sustain it. (PHB, pg 59). -We are also told some durations are Sustainable. Your interpretation seems to be that [I]any duration [/I]involved in a Sustainable power [I]automatically [/I]becomes a Sustainable duration. I admit, I can see why you might think that, but I don't think it holds up, either when taking a closer look at the rules, or when examining many of the existing Sustainable powers out there. -So, how do we know if a duration is Sustainable? Typically, because the Sustain line itself makes mention of the condition, zone or conjuration that persists due to Sustaining the power. I can see nothing in the rules that says that a condition caused by a power, but not referenced in its Sustain line, is nonetheless automatically extended when the power is Sustained. Similarly, I think the rules make it clear (along with the three example powers I gave earlier) that it is entirely possible to have a power which can be sustained without having any condition, zone or conjuration created by the power. Do we at least have agreement on that count? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Typo or deliberate?
Top