Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Typo or deliberate?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrMyth" data-source="post: 5733076" data-attributes="member: 61155"><p>Also, to directly respond to a few statements: </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Don't exceptions to the general rule have to actually make it clear they are exceptions? All of the problematic powers I listed don't indicate any such thing. Are we supposed to assume they are exceptions because it would otherwise be problematic? Does any interpretation of the rules, which requires the players to blindly guess whether that rule should apply, really sound like a good idea? Especially when we have an alternate interpretation that requires no guess-work, and allows each power to operate precisely as written without a single problem?</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>The point is that it <em>does not need </em>to have an invisible effect. The only thing a power needs to be sustainable is to <em>have a Sustain entry in the power</em>. What happens when you sustain it? Whatever the Sustain entry tells you happens!</p><p> </p><p>Look, here are the two rules you are arguing: </p><p> </p><p>"A power can only be sustained if an effect exists that it can make persist."</p><p>"All effects created by a power are caused to persist when that power is sustained."</p><p> </p><p>Neither of these rules <em>actually exists. </em>You have added in these additional assumptions, and built your entire argument on top of them, but it is shaky ground. Those rules are never given to us, the existence of them causes significant issues with numerous existing powers, and it is even outright contradicted by how many powers are explicitly designed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrMyth, post: 5733076, member: 61155"] Also, to directly respond to a few statements: Don't exceptions to the general rule have to actually make it clear they are exceptions? All of the problematic powers I listed don't indicate any such thing. Are we supposed to assume they are exceptions because it would otherwise be problematic? Does any interpretation of the rules, which requires the players to blindly guess whether that rule should apply, really sound like a good idea? Especially when we have an alternate interpretation that requires no guess-work, and allows each power to operate precisely as written without a single problem? The point is that it [I]does not need [/I]to have an invisible effect. The only thing a power needs to be sustainable is to [I]have a Sustain entry in the power[/I]. What happens when you sustain it? Whatever the Sustain entry tells you happens! Look, here are the two rules you are arguing: "A power can only be sustained if an effect exists that it can make persist." "All effects created by a power are caused to persist when that power is sustained." Neither of these rules [I]actually exists. [/I]You have added in these additional assumptions, and built your entire argument on top of them, but it is shaky ground. Those rules are never given to us, the existence of them causes significant issues with numerous existing powers, and it is even outright contradicted by how many powers are explicitly designed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Typo or deliberate?
Top