Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Typo or deliberate?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kobold Trevor" data-source="post: 5735515" data-attributes="member: 82759"><p>Wow, while Crown of Stars is unique and a bit confusing, I'm a bit surprised at the amount of back and forth it's caused this time around, but maybe that's because I've made so many assumptions about the power over the years <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":P" title="Stick out tongue :P" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":P" /> I went over what I thought the correct interpretation was for Crown of Stars and then ran it past Jeremy Crawford down in R&D. He corrected some of my assumptions and now I'm ready to lay it all out.</p><p></p><p>So first things first - Jeremy pointed out to me that we will be updating the power in a future rules update. On to the clarifications!</p><p></p><p>The bit about being blinded if you miss with the power is definitely wrong - sorry that wasn't caught in that second answer. It's in the hit line, so you have to hit to blind the bloodied foe.</p><p></p><p>To answer the original question, the defense entries are correct. It's reflex for the primary, and will for the secondary. If you want to make a case for your DM to change it, I wish you the best of luck.</p><p></p><p>Now as to the sustained discussion. When you sustain a power, you do exactly what it says in the entry line for sustaining that power. Sustaining does not automatically sustain whatever effect the power may have caused, though almost every power with sustain does something to an effect of the power. In order for an effect's duration to be sustained, the sustain entry must specifically mention this.</p><p></p><p>In the case of Crown of Stars, sustaining (as a minor action) allows you to make a secondary attack. It does not maintain the blindness - it does exactly what the sustain entry states.</p><p></p><p>Now the next wonky part is whether or not you can sustain and make a secondary attack if you miss the target with the original attack. A power has to set the parameters for sustaining its effects, and crown of stars fails to do so. As I mentioned earlier, we will address this in a future rules update, but in the meantime, the intent is that the power can be sustained whether or not the attack hits.</p><p></p><p>For those of us having trouble understanding the power, it might be best to think of it as if it had an extra effect line that read "Effect: radiant starlight circles around your head." This way it makes sense that you're sustaining this effect, and using it to make an attack when you sustain.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kobold Trevor, post: 5735515, member: 82759"] Wow, while Crown of Stars is unique and a bit confusing, I'm a bit surprised at the amount of back and forth it's caused this time around, but maybe that's because I've made so many assumptions about the power over the years :P I went over what I thought the correct interpretation was for Crown of Stars and then ran it past Jeremy Crawford down in R&D. He corrected some of my assumptions and now I'm ready to lay it all out. So first things first - Jeremy pointed out to me that we will be updating the power in a future rules update. On to the clarifications! The bit about being blinded if you miss with the power is definitely wrong - sorry that wasn't caught in that second answer. It's in the hit line, so you have to hit to blind the bloodied foe. To answer the original question, the defense entries are correct. It's reflex for the primary, and will for the secondary. If you want to make a case for your DM to change it, I wish you the best of luck. Now as to the sustained discussion. When you sustain a power, you do exactly what it says in the entry line for sustaining that power. Sustaining does not automatically sustain whatever effect the power may have caused, though almost every power with sustain does something to an effect of the power. In order for an effect's duration to be sustained, the sustain entry must specifically mention this. In the case of Crown of Stars, sustaining (as a minor action) allows you to make a secondary attack. It does not maintain the blindness - it does exactly what the sustain entry states. Now the next wonky part is whether or not you can sustain and make a secondary attack if you miss the target with the original attack. A power has to set the parameters for sustaining its effects, and crown of stars fails to do so. As I mentioned earlier, we will address this in a future rules update, but in the meantime, the intent is that the power can be sustained whether or not the attack hits. For those of us having trouble understanding the power, it might be best to think of it as if it had an extra effect line that read "Effect: radiant starlight circles around your head." This way it makes sense that you're sustaining this effect, and using it to make an attack when you sustain. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Typo or deliberate?
Top