Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
UA 8 Bastions and Cantrips playtest survey is now live. Update now closed.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 9170772" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>Of course you can.  You write all your critique in the comments section.</p><p></p><p>The thing I think most people forget is that not a single person at WotC cares about (general) YOUR opinion.  Not your <em>specific</em> opinion.  (General) you might have the greatest critique in the world... but you are still just <strong>one of thousands</strong> of people, all of whom have opinions.  So the best any of us can do is participate in the manner WotC has laid out for us.</p><p></p><p>Which means if you like something foundationally but have major issues on specific things (like say for example Flex in the Weapon Mastery system)... you need to score things such that you lend your voice to keeping something in place, and then lend your voice to comments that collectively show WotC where they might have made a mistake.  But (general) your individual comment?  Won't have any impact.</p><p></p><p>Some folks here went into really in-depth detail as to why Flex was a bad Mastery.  They might have had the most precise and indicative evidence and proven without a shadow of a doubt that it shouldn't be in the game.  But guess what?  Even if those comments were 100% on target... <em>it wouldn't have mattered</em> if they were the only 6-10 people amongst the <strong>40,000</strong> respondents to make that case.  If everybody else didn't care and found Flex to be perfectly acceptable as-is... then there's a pretty good chance WotC wouldn't have done anything.  And that's the issue-- NONE of us can make an <em>individual</em> effect here.  We can only be <em>one of many</em> voices offering up critique that has import.</p><p></p><p>So we have to go into these surveys and not try and "stand out" by making a grand show of ourselves... like trying to thumb your nose at the entire process by voting '1' straight down the line in an effort to show WotC how bad you think their process is.  No one cares that you felt "so offended" by what WotC gave you that you felt you had no choice but to make this personal grand show of downvoting every single thing in some new section they were asking your opinion on (because again... all those '1's were merely just a single voice of probably 100 to 500 OTHER voices that all voted '1' straight down the line too).  Rather... we need to just be smart about it.  If there are things that have a good basis to start but poor execution... you vote middle of the road.  You lend your voice to the thousands of people who also go middle of the road so that WotC ends up curious as to why there were all these '3' votes and maybe then spends a little more time looking at the comments to figure it out.  Instead of your '1' vote lending itself to the large group of other '1' and '2' votes that absolutely decimate the opinion level and tell WotC it isn't even worth wasting their time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 9170772, member: 7006"] Of course you can. You write all your critique in the comments section. The thing I think most people forget is that not a single person at WotC cares about (general) YOUR opinion. Not your [I]specific[/I] opinion. (General) you might have the greatest critique in the world... but you are still just [B]one of thousands[/B] of people, all of whom have opinions. So the best any of us can do is participate in the manner WotC has laid out for us. Which means if you like something foundationally but have major issues on specific things (like say for example Flex in the Weapon Mastery system)... you need to score things such that you lend your voice to keeping something in place, and then lend your voice to comments that collectively show WotC where they might have made a mistake. But (general) your individual comment? Won't have any impact. Some folks here went into really in-depth detail as to why Flex was a bad Mastery. They might have had the most precise and indicative evidence and proven without a shadow of a doubt that it shouldn't be in the game. But guess what? Even if those comments were 100% on target... [I]it wouldn't have mattered[/I] if they were the only 6-10 people amongst the [B]40,000[/B] respondents to make that case. If everybody else didn't care and found Flex to be perfectly acceptable as-is... then there's a pretty good chance WotC wouldn't have done anything. And that's the issue-- NONE of us can make an [I]individual[/I] effect here. We can only be [I]one of many[/I] voices offering up critique that has import. So we have to go into these surveys and not try and "stand out" by making a grand show of ourselves... like trying to thumb your nose at the entire process by voting '1' straight down the line in an effort to show WotC how bad you think their process is. No one cares that you felt "so offended" by what WotC gave you that you felt you had no choice but to make this personal grand show of downvoting every single thing in some new section they were asking your opinion on (because again... all those '1's were merely just a single voice of probably 100 to 500 OTHER voices that all voted '1' straight down the line too). Rather... we need to just be smart about it. If there are things that have a good basis to start but poor execution... you vote middle of the road. You lend your voice to the thousands of people who also go middle of the road so that WotC ends up curious as to why there were all these '3' votes and maybe then spends a little more time looking at the comments to figure it out. Instead of your '1' vote lending itself to the large group of other '1' and '2' votes that absolutely decimate the opinion level and tell WotC it isn't even worth wasting their time. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
UA 8 Bastions and Cantrips playtest survey is now live. Update now closed.
Top