Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
UA interviews: The possible future for Pet Subclasses in 5e.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="doctorbadwolf" data-source="post: 7828986" data-attributes="member: 6704184"><p>The fact that you insist on continuing to imply that anyone that wants a specific mechanism for regaining the pet when it dies, isn’t a pet lover, is both dishonest, overwrought (we are talking a game, not my actual dog who is sleeping with head on my lap right now), and insulting. Knock it the hell off. Grow up. </p><p></p><p>The fact that you keep responding to me as if I’m talking about replacing the pet when I have exclusively talked about regaining the pet, tells me that you’re just skimming people’s post in order to be argumentative. </p><p></p><p>And I don’t care about your grudge against wotc. </p><p></p><p>As for the revised ranger, I never said wotc had fixed the ranger already. Stop replying to people as if they’d said crap they didn’t say. It’s both rude, and makes you look like you aren’t paying attention. </p><p></p><p>What I said, repeating myself for hopefully the last time, is that they have accomplished the goal of a balanced pet that doesn’t die frequently. The revised beast master ranger, in total, is not more powerful than other PHB classes, and it has a pet that won’t die any more often than most PCs. Your claim that it can’t be done is objectively false. It has been proven false. </p><p></p><p>It also has a mechanism for bringing the pet back, because most BM players are going to want to know that they can bring their pet back, and thus feel comfortable bringing it into danger in the first place. I’d never let my dog anywhere near a fight IRL, bc I have no way to magically heal him, and if he dies that’s it. Part of playing a BM Ranger is playing the fantasy of my pet never being permanently gone. OTOH, asking the player to sacrifice the components and demand the service of another PC in order to regain their entire subclass, is just bonkers-level bad design. </p><p></p><p>Having the mechanism for resurrection in the hands of the ranger does not imply anything of the sort that you claim it does. It literally just means that the ranger in a group with no cleric or Druid can still keep their subclass after it gets hit by a maxed out lighting bolt partway through a tough fight. Just like could happen to the rogue or the wizard. The wolf has better armor than a normal wolf, rogue level HP, and proficiency on all saves. It isn’t equal to a PC, or even half a PC, or whatever, but it keeps up in terms of durability, and it contributes damage that brings the BM on par with other damage focused characters.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="doctorbadwolf, post: 7828986, member: 6704184"] The fact that you insist on continuing to imply that anyone that wants a specific mechanism for regaining the pet when it dies, isn’t a pet lover, is both dishonest, overwrought (we are talking a game, not my actual dog who is sleeping with head on my lap right now), and insulting. Knock it the hell off. Grow up. The fact that you keep responding to me as if I’m talking about replacing the pet when I have exclusively talked about regaining the pet, tells me that you’re just skimming people’s post in order to be argumentative. And I don’t care about your grudge against wotc. As for the revised ranger, I never said wotc had fixed the ranger already. Stop replying to people as if they’d said crap they didn’t say. It’s both rude, and makes you look like you aren’t paying attention. What I said, repeating myself for hopefully the last time, is that they have accomplished the goal of a balanced pet that doesn’t die frequently. The revised beast master ranger, in total, is not more powerful than other PHB classes, and it has a pet that won’t die any more often than most PCs. Your claim that it can’t be done is objectively false. It has been proven false. It also has a mechanism for bringing the pet back, because most BM players are going to want to know that they can bring their pet back, and thus feel comfortable bringing it into danger in the first place. I’d never let my dog anywhere near a fight IRL, bc I have no way to magically heal him, and if he dies that’s it. Part of playing a BM Ranger is playing the fantasy of my pet never being permanently gone. OTOH, asking the player to sacrifice the components and demand the service of another PC in order to regain their entire subclass, is just bonkers-level bad design. Having the mechanism for resurrection in the hands of the ranger does not imply anything of the sort that you claim it does. It literally just means that the ranger in a group with no cleric or Druid can still keep their subclass after it gets hit by a maxed out lighting bolt partway through a tough fight. Just like could happen to the rogue or the wizard. The wolf has better armor than a normal wolf, rogue level HP, and proficiency on all saves. It isn’t equal to a PC, or even half a PC, or whatever, but it keeps up in terms of durability, and it contributes damage that brings the BM on par with other damage focused characters. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
UA interviews: The possible future for Pet Subclasses in 5e.
Top